Jump to content

User talk:Vizcarra/POV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedians who push a determined POV

[edit]

This group of people work on articles of the same topics and often against individuals who attempt to level the POV. They are all admins, so they are experienced wikipedians. Being experienced and asking each other for backup causes that they push POVs at the expense of Wikipedia and the patience of other users.

One of the latest examples: is this incident. They often revert to cause other users to violate the 3RR rule and thus block users who have a different POV.

A month earlier, the same users caused my 3RR rule violation.

A month before this, a user created SlimVirginJayjgJpgordon but SlimVirgin deleted the user name, categorizing her change as a "minor edit", which is something they often which may cause their changes to appear under the radar of other admins or wikipedians.

It should be noted as well, that these individuals revert quite often and many times chunks of information when they don't agree with one. If the information are corrected they bring up a second reasoning to remove the section. After all information is corrected they often choose to remove it because it is too much information. Like in this occasion , where Jpgordon even mentions that they "we" have a section already so the added information is rejected.

Also note the name calling and repeated reverts with weak justification Jayjg is involved in. In this occassion, the anonymous user showed significantly more maturity than Jayjg. So much that Jayjg had to be reverted and restrained. He later made a come back to revert edits by User:Guy Montag who were reverted a right-wing extremist which has a picture of a rifle on top of the map of Israel. Go figure, at least he's more honest than the other 3.

Update

[edit]

In September 2005 at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yuber/Proposed decision#Jayjg, Jayjg was "reminded that edit-warring is harmful to Wikipedia's mission", he was also advised to "use Wikipedia's dispute resolution procedure in preference to attempting to control content through the use of reverts".

Quarrel with FuelWagon

[edit]

SlimVirgin and FuelWagon have been arguing for the last few weeks about a couple of content issues and this situation escalated.

No surprise, but Jayjg got involved too. SlimVirgin/Jayjg again reverted 6 times causing FuelWagon to revert six times back. Jayjg reported it as a 3RR violation, no surpise... again, using a deceitful account of the events here.