User talk:Vixra

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It also looks as though you may well be evading a block on another account. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It does not look like that sir. Why would it look like that? And may I know what exactly I was "vandalizing"?

Well, for a start, posting a message to a user's talk page telling them to "suck" is not very constructive. Then, it always seems questionable when someone creates an almost meaningless page with an appropriate speedy deletion tag already in place. Then, when it turns out that the text of that page, including the speedy deletion tag, are taken almost verbatim from a page created long ago by another account, one starts wondering. That leads on to examining other features of the account's editing, and before long it starts looking dubious. However, please note that I am not saying that I believe that this account is evading a block, only that it looks possible. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obito Uchiha

Please stop unmerging an article without understanding why it was merged in the first place. A consensus is not made by number of users but by guidelines. The article fails WP:Notability and contains WP:Fancruft. Read the actual guidelines before unmerging it Afd are for the complete deletion of information including links and should not be used for a mergers. If you wish to work in the article first do it in a sandbox and the propose it before reverting edits. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ALL the people who have edited that page except you and spidervenom123 seem to disagree with you on his notability. IMO Obito is arguably more notable than Itachi. Guidelines are just that: guidelines. Your unilateral actions go against consensus. Or if you are confident that consensus is on your side, please restore the article that you have effectively deleted and propose it formally at WP:PM Vixra (talk) 08:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again. That is not consensus. Consensus is not made by number of people. You also don't appear to know what is notability in Wikipedia yet. It's not importance in the series. To make it short it is coverage by third party sources so don't ignore guidelines which can result in being blocked for discruptive editing.Tintor2 (talk) 13:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying I should now become a third party and cover Obito? I'm guessing Masashi Kishimoto is the 1st party. Who's the 2nd? Then I should come here and quote myself as 3rd party source and I own consensus even if everyone on Wikipedia wants to redirect because I'm following guidelines? And what is this discruptive editing that you speak of? Sounds like fun...Vixra (talk) 14:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't read a thing about sourcing so don't revert. Such editing will result in a block.Tintor2 (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ok, I admit it. I'm that other guy you blocked and I created a new account. I'm sorry, please don't block me...Vixra (talk) 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the statement about becoming third party that would only address one issue. Sources also need to have a history of fact checking and accuracy, something thst you simply reporting a third party would not achieve. Please see WP:IRS.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 03:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Vsmith (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]