User talk:Vivie Chan
February 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chibi Devi!, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chibi Devi! was changed by Vivie Chan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955441 on 2012-02-19T08:11:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Last Game
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Last Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NTox · talk 07:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Last Game. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:
- Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
- This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Last Game. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Last Game, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Reported to AIV
[edit]Hi Vivie Chan, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at Last Game to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 08:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Last Game
[edit]Hi. I am letting you know that I have moved Last Game to your userspace at User:Vivie_Chan/Last_Game. The page contained a copyright violation that I removed; please understand that this is a serious legal issue. If you like, you can work on the article where it was moved, but please substantiate the article's notability by providing several independent, reliable sources. As is stands, the article is unsuitable for the encyclopedia. NTox · talk 03:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)