User talk:Vivehoadie/sandbox

Peer Review 1 (Evan Maunders) 3/29/2016

This article is headed in the right direction, but is obviously still a work-in-progress content wise. For the sake of simplicity, I will list out the couple issues I noticed:

Major Points:

-Missing citations in several areas; Traditional Techniques section does not have any and the second sentence of the RESS section probably needs one. -Some sections still need filling out; in particular the "examples" section is usually much more thorough in these kind of processing articles. Maybe add another example/use or two. -the traditional techniques section seems like it could be expanded upon as well. -The "advantages" section is a bit confusing. It's not clear what "cheap...Solvents" is an advantage over, for instance, considering that the traditional techniques you spoke of before didn't include any solvent based processes. It may be worth including a sentence or two more of explanation underneath all of these.

Overall, a definite improvement over the current article though!

Peer Review 2 (Evan Maunders)

The article definitely has shown improvement over the past week; here are just a few more things that jumped out while I was reading through a second time.

-I like the simplicity of the first sentence. Editors often try to summarize every major point in the article in their opening sentence in my wiki experience, and it usually comes across as confusing. -I still feel that you need to be a bit broader in scope in your "applications" section. It gives off the impression that the only major industrial application of micronization is in the production of hormone products. I am not the expert in these types of processes that you Chem. e's are, but I would have assumed that micronization had a more widespread usage than just the biotech industry. Even if you cant go in as much depth with other applications, just listing some would work too I think -"The PGSS method has the advantage that because of the supercritical fluid, the melting point of the solid material is reduced" should probably be accompanied by a source - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Officerbigcactus (talk • contribs) 13:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)