User talk:VivaEspana11
Warning for Van Fortress
[edit]Please do not revert edits like [this one] without providing a proper reason. If you continue this behavior, you might be reported to a Wikipedia noticeboard. Sincerely, BaxçeyêReş (talk) 23:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I have warned you once, and I will do so again: Do not conduct edits like [this], erasing sourced information while providing none for your claims. If one more of your edits is disruptive, I will report you to WP:ANI for WP:NOTTHERE and WP:VANDALISM. BaxçeyêReş (talk) 16:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Dzveli Kveshi
[edit]Please, stop pushing other name on "Dzveli Kveshi" as if it is more important or equally used like "Dzveli Kveshi" (when you make it bold, that must have a ground). Simple Google search shows that the name 'Zol-Goyach' is used almost nowhere, except on wiki or its mirror pages (and in total 165 cases). While name "Dzveli Kveshi" is used officially and Google search shows 14,300 results. Also, I don't see any reliable source which would indicate that the name 'Zol-Goyach' azerbaijani name, provide sources. --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 12:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Kevo327 (talk) 19:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Firstly, please check the talk page of Aşağı Ağcakənd. This wikipedia is not an Armenian wikipedia. VivaEspana11 (talk page) 19:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EljanM, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
- Kevo327 (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Aşağı Ağcakənd shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Kevo327 (talk) 09:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)