User talk:Vitalyb

Welcome!

Hello Vitalyb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 23:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Satanism

This Minor Barnstar is for Vitalyb for making the Satanism template look fricken' cool.

I like what you've done with that! It looks great. ♠P M C♠ 01:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! =) It encourages to see that people notice. I haven't yet finished too =). --Vitalyb 20:24, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I made the template into the red version that it was when you must have first seen it, so I keep an eye on it =) Keep up the killer work! ♠PMC♠ 07:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC) Edit - I'm not sure about the black type on black bars though, maybe change the font to scarlet or something, so that it's legible?[reply]
  - I actually did like the scarlet =( I just couldn't figure out how I change the links to the same color as font (white), same way they did here, for example: Template:Heavymetal. I'll look at it some more =\. But do change to how you feel it looks better. P.S On that subject, I wish I could do some kind of CSS in tables. All this
    (ab)use is so 1994. --Vitalyb 00:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Let me have a look at it, I'll see if I can work out how to change the font colors. Scarlet on black, or white on scarlet, or black on scarlet? ♠P M C♠ 00:53, 4 December 2005 (UTC) Got it. Check it out =D[reply]

Fixing(?) silly colors in template:Satanism

I mean the following change: [1]

It is great you cleaned the markup but what is it about the colors? They seemed alright to me (more fitting to the theme at least). Could you elaborate? --Vitalyb

Uhhh, what can I say - do you see the marijuana article covered with green? The hell article covered in red? All the tables of contents look the same - it's about consistency. ¦ Reisio 02:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, but the Heavy metal template has red titles and it looks good. In fact, many templates have different colors do you see something especially wrong with this template being black besides? --Vitalyb 13:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't particularly care for that one, either, but only the headings have been altered, and red isn't a color that automatically makes me think "heavy metal". Making a box dark gray with BLACK headings on the Satanism article, however, smacks of embellishment and is moreover a stark contrast to the default monobook skin, decreasing readability - imho. ¦ Reisio 17:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Londo and Drakh.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Londo and Drakh.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Londo and Drakh.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Londo and Drakh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]