User talk:Vital57

Copyright problems with Via Art

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Via Art, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.museumstuff.com/learn/topics/VitaliV::sub::Style. As a copyright violation, Via Art appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Via Art has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Via Art and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Via Art with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Via Art.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 16:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new article

Hey there! Unfortunately, I have had to delete your article as we take copyright infringement very seriously here and it cannot be left up on the website without explicit permission from the copyright holder releasing the material under the WP:CCBYSA license. However, if you would like to draft a new article, please consider doing so in your userspace. This way you can work on it to your heart's content without anyone deleting it.

I hope this has been helpful but should you require any additional assistance feel free to drop me a line on my talk page and I will be happy to help. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Vital57. You have new messages at Panyd's talk page.
Message added 21:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 17:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Via Art

The article Via Art has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a recreation of a deleted article. There is no evidence of notability for this neologism. The term Via art could be redirected to the article VitaliV.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. freshacconci talktalk 17:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Via Art for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Via Art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Via Art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 21:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]