User talk:Visocap

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to White Latin American, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 21:28, 25 November 2010 (UTC) ok, i am studing politics and I did and I made no less than a month an investigation into causacicos descendants in Colombia, the Colombian audience ethnography and cultural systems have already verified the item, to verify my studies is necessary to enter to the website of the Colombian ethnography of 2010 given by the national government thanks[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White Latin American. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SamEV (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue reverting in the article on White Latin Americans - your version is not in line with our policies that prohibit synthesis and original research. Also you should note that in wikipedia we improve articles by consensus - not by edit warring. If you continue to editwar instead of trying to achieve a compromise with other editors you will merely end up being blocked from editing.·Maunus·ƛ· 16:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Visocap, en su fuente no aparece nada de lo escribió. Asegúrese de indicar en cual página exactamente está, si desea añadir esa información otra vez.

Y tenga más cuidado, ya que terminó cambiando la información que se atribuye a la CIA, erroneamente. SamEV (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC) buen, cambiare el articulo sin modificarcion la CIA[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing your edit war through the obvious sockpuppet Camilo2219 (talk · contribs). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]