User talk:VisitBlackpool

Showzam

A tag has been placed on Showzam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Showzam and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ceating articles about subjects in which you have some involvement

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Showzam. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Showzam

I have nominated Showzam, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showzam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool Illuminations

As you do not provide edit summaries, it is not possible to determine why you have removed content and the external link from the Blackpool Illuminations page. Could you please at least confirm why? Thank you. --♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool Resort Pass

The Blackpool Resort Pass can be purchased to allow access to a number of Blackpool's tourist attractions such as The Blackpool Tower Eye and 4D Experience, Blackpool Zoo, Blackpool Model Village & Gardens, Blackpool Pleasure Beach, The Blackpool Tower Dungeon, Madamme Tussauds Blackpool, SEA LIFE Blackpool, Nickelodeon Land, Sandcastle Waterpark and Blackpool Tower Circus.

The Blackpool Resort Pass is a collaboration between Marketing Blackpool, Merlin Entertainments, Blackpool Pleasure Beach, Sandcastle Waterpark, Blackpool Zoo and Blackpool Model Village and Gardens. The Pass was first launched in 2012 and was relaunched in February 2013 with it's own website.

The Blackpool Resort Pass has two options, an original pass and a pass plus which was introduced in February 2013. The Blackpool Resort Pass includes discounted tickets to each of the attractions.

The Original Pass

The Original Blackpool Resort Pass includes The Blackpool Tower Eye and 4D Experience, Blackpool Pleasure Beach, Madamme Tussauds Blackpool, SEA LIFE Blackpool, Blackpool Tower Dungeon and Nickelodeon Land. The original pass was launched towards the beginning of 2012 by Merlin Entertainments Ltd and Blackpool Pleasure Beach Resort.

The Blackpool Resort Pass Plus

The Blackpool Resort Pass Plus includes The Blackpool Tower Eye and 4D Experience, Blackpool Zoo, Blackpool Model Village & Gardens, Blackpool Pleasure Beach, Madamme Tussauds Blackpool, SEA LIFE Blackpool, Blackpool Tower Dungeon, Nickelodeon Land and Sandcastle Waterpark.

Additions to the Blackpool Resort Pass

Additional items can be added to the Blackpool Resort Pass including bus and tram tickets from Blackpool Transport and Blackpool Tower Circus tickets.

April 2013

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Blackpool, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Fraggle81 (talk) 14:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blackpool Resort Pass

Hello VisitBlackpool,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blackpool Resort Pass for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blackpool Resort Pass

The article Blackpool Resort Pass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references to indicate notability per WP:GNG, and no sources online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, VisitBlackpool, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, should you return to editing, I strongly recommend that you read our policy on sourcing. It is vital to source your edits to independent, reliable sources if you want your edits at Wikipedia to stick around for any length of time. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]