User talk:VishwaNayani

Welcome

Hello, VishwaNayani, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is VishwaNayani's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Balaji Educational Society (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sri Balaji Educational Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sri Balaji Educational Society, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VishwaNayani! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Balaji Educational Society (December 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Harshil169 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Harshil ^{want to talk?} 05:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you were asking on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help for help improving your draft. If you read the messages from the reviewers, they are telling you that no amount of editing will make this article acceptable. Wikipedia articles must be about notable subjects, which - in practice - means that it must be possible to find independent, in-depth coverage of the subject in books, magazines, journals, or newspapers. Your draft does nothing to show that the institution has this sort of coverage and most reviewers will not go so far as rejecting a draft - as distinguished from merely declining it - without having done some independent scouting around for whether the might be notability sources out there, but they just had not been used in the draft.

You should realize that, on Wikipedia, creating a whole new article is one of the hardest tasks you could have chosen. We advise new editors to start with small improvements to existing articles and to do that for a considerable time before trying to create a new one. There are so many policies, guidelines, and conventions to learn that it often becomes very frustrating to a new editor. By making many smaller edits, one can learn the ropes and - while it may seem counterintuitive - be on your way to creating your first new article in less overall elapsed time than if you choose to start that new article as your very first task. Part of the problem is that one can wait a long time for a review - you will be forgiven for thinking that the review process with such long wait times is broken.

You said at the help desk that this article is not something you have a special connection with, so look around and find other articles in which you might have an interest and find ways to improve them. There is also the community portal where you can pick up small tasks based on the category of what needs to be done.

But there's no place on Wikipedia where you can find help to make a non-notable subject into a notable one. That judgment about notability is decided in the wider world, by whether reporters choose to write about the subject (or not). — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Palle Raghunatha Reddy

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Palle Raghunatha Reddy), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CatcherStorm ^talk 12:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palle Venkata Krishna Kishore Reddy (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Palle Venkata Krishna Kishore Reddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Palle Venkata Krishna Kishore Reddy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sri Balaji Educational Society concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sri Balaji Educational Society, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Palle Venkata Krishna Kishore Reddy

Hello, VishwaNayani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palle Venkata Krishna Kishore Reddy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sri Balaji Educational Society

Hello, VishwaNayani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sri Balaji Educational Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]