User talk:Vishnumukundan

Image tagging for Image:Sunset from West Shore, Walney.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunset from West Shore, Walney.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Ramsden Square.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Ramsden Square.JPG. The copy called Image:Ramsden Square.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gleaston Castle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gleaston Castle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Kent Estuary.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Kent Estuary.jpg. The copy called Image:Kent Estuary.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Rampside.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Rampside.jpg. The copy called Image:Rampside.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aranmula.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Aranmula.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Aranmula.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Aranmula.jpg. The copy called Image:Aranmula.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aranmula.JPG

I have re-added the template, as the situation is not changed. Can you please add a license and a description to the image? It would be a pity to lose a nice photo. Thank you. Deadstar 11:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Image:Aranmula.JPG. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's [[Talk:Image:Aranmula.JPG|talk page]]. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.StephenBuxton 13:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in Image:Aranmula.JPG. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. StephenBuxton 08:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:The Sex Pistols MEN.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Sex Pistols MEN.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Joan Jett NEC.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Joan Jett NEC.jpg. The copy called Image:Joan Jett NEC.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:London Bus.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:London Bus.JPG. The copy called Image:London Bus.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 00:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hans Christian Andersen statue.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hans Christian Andersen statue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Forrester (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:BAE Systems from Walney.jpg

File:BAE Systems from Walney.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:BAE Systems from Walney.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:BAE Systems from Walney.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sunset from West Shore, Walney.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sunset from West Shore, Walney.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Aranmula.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]