User talk:Visa boscono

January 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Erica Veronica von und zu Daun. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. --Rrburke^(talk) 17:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Constantin von Kasa-Hunyady

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Gabriel Constantin von Kasa-Hunyady, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Constantin von Kasa-Hunyady

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Constantin von Kasa-Hunyady, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marija Jelizaveta Yusupova

I have nominated Marija Jelizaveta Yusupova, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marija Jelizaveta Yusupova. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erica Ricolfi-Doria

Are you done with Erica Ricolfi-Doria because it is going to get deleted if you leave it like that. otisjimmy1 (talk) 10:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erica Ricolfi-Doria

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Erica Ricolfi-Doria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unverifiable, appears to be a hoax

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Snigbrook 02:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Erica Ricolfi-Doria

An article that you have been involved in editing, Erica Ricolfi-Doria, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erica Ricolfi-Doria. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Snigbrook 14:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]