User talk:Localproblem7110

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this information; republicworld is considered generally unreliable, and we shouldn't change existing, more reliable, sources into ones that are listed as unreliable. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Virtue1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Virtue1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Adrian Brooks

added a link pointing to John Brooks

The Home That 2 Built

added a link pointing to Michael Deacon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ivica Iliev

added a link pointing to Serbian

Liam Renton

added a link pointing to Immanuel Lutheran College

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tinkovu (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tinkovu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tinkovu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. An edit that you recently made to John Inglis (footballer, born 1859) seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Giant Snowman 14:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tinkovu (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tinkovu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tinkovu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Brown (tennis), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lowell High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jorge de Avilez Zuzarte de Sousa Tavares, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portalegre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duck's Breath Mystery Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lara McSpadden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WNBL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rowan Gillies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi Virtue1234! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Washington Post that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Renat 11:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tinkovu

Hello, Virtue1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tinkovu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tinkovu

Hello, Virtue1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tinkovu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raja Radhika Raman Sinha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surajpura. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandipat Sahay has been accepted

Chandipat Sahay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GrabUp - Talk 02:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hi Localproblem7110! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit in 'Zamindars of Bihar'

I deleted your edit because There was no concept of 'Indian state of Bihar' during Mughal reign, and you provided a source with little information that could have been done without damage to the preceding sources. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 15:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very well. thank you for incorporating my edits as well. however, i noticed your edit on the castes of zamindars was inadequate - it only contained data for a small amount of time, from 1765 to 1793, whereas the zamindars in bihar existed for centuries. i thus put a more encompassing source with updated information Localproblem7110 (talk) 16:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Localproblem7110. Thank you for your work on Sahay family. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nicely improved. Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]