User talk:Virendrak

Welcome...

Hello, Virendrak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dana boomer (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marwari horse, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Veggies (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marwari horse

Virendrak - While we appreciate your edits, and always enjoy working with an expert on the subject, it must be remembered that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that relies on reliable sources. You are removing and changing information sourced to reliable, independent sources, and are doing so without providing new sources or reasons for your removal of information. In a couple of places you are simply removing sources, without apparently disagreeing with the content they are referencing. This goes again everything WP stands for, and if you continue doing so (and continue reverting without discussion), you may end up having your editing privileges revoked. If you have sources with new information, or information that contradicts that currently in the article, please present them for integration into the article. However, removing information on exports, genetic studies and other tidbits, as well as photographs and references, without explanation or replacement, is unacceptable. It doesn't really matter if your edits are "authorized" by your organization - Wikipedia is built by consensus, and does not allow organizations devoted to a subject to dictate the content of articles at the expense of a reliance on reliable, third-party sources. Dana boomer (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]