User talk:Vipinhari/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 8

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –xeno^talk 17:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Xeno. Vipinhari || talk 17:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

What's your Raashee?

Hi Somebody put a bunch of garbage on What's Your Raashee? today. Can you revert it please? BTW, how do you get this ability? Bollyjeff (talk) 15:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 12:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey Bollyjeff, no special ability is required to revert vandalism. Just be bold and remove those. If you are referring to rollback feature, see here. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 13:00, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Looking there, I think its gonna be a while til I am allowed to have rollback rights. Since you recently did a rollback on this page, I thouht that you could do it again. Since they put in about 9 edits in a row, it would be much easier than 9 undos. If not I will do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 13:27, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Done. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 18:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and I'll try to remember to sign my posts. Bollyjeff (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Russell Fowler AfD

Hi Vipinhari, just wanted to apologise because I appear to have broken a rule on the Nick Russell Fowler AfD discussion by starting two supportive comments with the word "Keep". Thanks for amending.

I've just looked through WP:AFD to find the details of the rule that I broke, but couldn't find it – can you point me in the right direction please? I was confused by your edit summary, which seemed to be referring to "votes". Regards — Hebrides (talk) 09:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hebrides, I don't think you've broken any rules, because I couldn't find any published rules as such. In AfD page, you might have noticed a link, AfD statistics. It was wrong at that time, possibly due to your unintentional second keep comment. That was the only reason why I've modified Keep to Comment. Please accept my apologies, if you think I should've discussed with you before amending your comment. - Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 12:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA

Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome! Congratulations on your successful RfA. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 17:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Austin Powell

Why are you proposing my article Austin powell for deletion? There are two references on it already, and it was just created minutes ago. There are pictures and other references that I intend to add, but right now I am at work and cannot access many websites for sources. However, he does have a main role in Standing Ovation (2010 Film) which will have a worldwide release, and right now, the cd is available on Itunes, and previews are playing on ABC Family and ABC. This seems notable enough to me. Iheartsox (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, not to sound bitchy, but why was I not notified that my article was up for deletion? It seems like a courtesy to notify the author of an article that you want to delete it... Iheartsox (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Iheartsox, please read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and provide some third-party verifiable references from reliable sources. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 16:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

I've tagged the article using Twinkle and it used to automatically inform the biography's creator. Since it didn't do that, I'll do it now formally, even though now you know that. Vipinhari || talk 16:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I'll work on sources ASAP. Iheartsox (talk) 16:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 01:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Please assist me with making a page for RVC Bodley

Can you please set the page up and then I will build it? I think this is the procedure for IPs. Alternatively, I could build it within this comment. honest, the guy is pretty notable. He had a famous essay that was reprinted by Dale Carnegie. He was a multiple author and popular. An associate of TE Lawrence. I think for young kids or something, they may not know him, because his works are not as widely read, post WW2, but really...I can prove the guy is well, well notable. So...shake your manly hand and will you make common cause with your enemy and ally with me in building the page? -humble IP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.253.96.249 (talk • contribs)

Hi 96.253.96.249, please go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit a request for creating a new article if you do not have an account here in Wikipedia. Or alternatively, you can create an user account and use the Article Wizard to create your article. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 18:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Seems like a brushoff, but I will give it a shot. If no one creates the page, will come back here...

Ok...I just looked at the AFC talk page and it is well known that there is a huge backlog and that system is broken. Will find a user who will help me in creating the page. Please resist the urge to delete for 24 hours, so we can build the thing... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.253.96.249 (talk • contribs)

S. Kalyanaraman

Good day,

S. Kalyanaraman is a Carnatic vocalist. Shivakumar Kalyanaraman is a different person.

There is an error in the bot...

Pls check

Rgds —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harryl (talk • contribs) 17:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Harryl, I also have noticed that. I've already noted it down in talk page of the article. You can remove the tag from the article and write a message on User talk:Coren. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 17:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

ParkRoyal

Hi Vipinhari

Please helpe me with my article, I do not know what am I doing wrong? I clean up again the article and I pick up all the links to other sites.

Explain me what phrase is wrong or the way that I have to do it.

Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by ParkRoyal (talk • contribs) 18:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi ParkRoyal, I think you're mentioning about the article Royal Holiday which you've created some time back. For every article in Wikipedia, there should be adequate third party references. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability & Wikipedia:Notability. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 18:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Villa holiday

Hello, I've reverted your speedy on Villa holiday. It's a term used in Britain for a certain type of vacation. Thanks, Empty Buffer (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Empty Buffer, thanks for letting me know. I've tagged it for notability. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 12:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Brookfield Infrastructure

Hi - i noticed you placed a notability template in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners - please note that i am expanding the article and citing more sources; this is a quite large (one billion dollars market capitalization) publicly traded company, so i'd like you to consider removing the notability template per WP:LISTED once i am finished - thanks --Itemirus^{Message me!} 18:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Itemirus, be bold and remove the notability tag with an appropriate edit summary if you think the company is notable enough. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 06:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Benu Sen

Dear Sir, As you put the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag on the newly created page 'Benu Sen', now I have given some differences. Please see and give me your valuable advices. Biswarup Ganguly 01:44, 25 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangulybiswarup (talk • contribs)

Hi Gangulybiswarup, All BLPs should cite reliable sources. Since you've added some, we can remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag, but try to find out more references. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 04:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Mighty Blue Kings

Hello Vipinhari. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Mighty Blue Kings, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: with more than 3000 Google News hits, the subject might be significant. Use WP:AFD instead please. Thank you. SoWhy 19:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey SoWhy, thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 13:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Notability

Judging by your past messages you seem to have a nasty habit of placing unwarranted tags in articles. I've 60,000 articles to my name on here, you'd think I'd know which buildings are notableby now... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Blofeld, I'm impressed that you've 60,000 articles to your name. But as you know, for any article in Wikipedia, like the article you've created, we need reliable third party sources. WP:BURDEN says that "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 12:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Kasi/Kassi/Kansi

See Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/Abc#Answers.com for my reasoning. However, I am guilty of not checking the link you provided. I didn't realize that Answers.com now had a section where users can provide answers to questions ("WikiAnswers"). This is different from the mirror that they've had in place for several years.

That said, it's difficult to say this is a clear copyvio. The original author of the Kasi (tribe) article (where it is now located) was User:Marifkhankasi, a name that does seem cognate with the "Muhammad Arif Kasi" who is credited for the WikiAnswers text. I would suggest getting some wider discussion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems.

Again, I apologize for not checking the link; for many years, Answers.com was little more than a mirror of Wikipedia, and we had many people try to source articles to Answers.com or think they were seeing copyvios.

-- Powers ^T 20:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Speedy Deletion Nomination of 4Troops Article Stub

On July 17, 2010 you placed the Speedy Deletion Warning on my user page for the 4Troops page I had created. Within less than 2 hours (!) admin Davewild decided to delete the article. I believe he is an overzealous admin (see his user talk page). My article stub was for a band that had appeared on a PBS show. If you Google 4Troops, you'll get one Million links. Cwagner

A tag has been placed on 4troops requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. ... Vipinhari || talk 08:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwagner (talk • contribs)

Hi Cwagner, I've noticed that you've joined WP in 2003, so you might know that verifiability is an important criteria while creating an article. Do you have any third-party, reliable, neutral source in the one-million-links which you'll get if you search for 4Troops? If yes, be bold and create the article citing those references, once again. Please read how to identify reliable sources. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 14:59, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody! Stats If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars. GOCE backlog elimination drive chart up to 31 July Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest. Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+). The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc. The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono. Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+). The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK. The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey. The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr. The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW. Gold Star Award Gold Star Award Leaderboard Articles Words 5k+ Articles 1. Diannaa (248) Shimeru (200,392) Shimeru/Ericleb01 (13) 2. Slon02 (157) Diannaa (164,960) Chaosdruid (8) 3. GaryColemanFan (101) Chaosdruid (130,630) Derild4921 (7) 4. Torchiest (100) The Utahraptor (117,347) GaryColemanFan/Slon02 (6) 5. Shimeru (80) Ericleb01 (114,893) Bejinhan/The Utahraptor (5) Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

CSD G4 on Navyug sena

Dear Vipin Hari, you placed a CSD G4 tag on the above article. On what parameter are you saying that the article content that you see is similar to the article content that was deleted? Would you perchance have access to the deleted version of the article? Generally, only administrators have that kind of access. Do kindly leave a note on my talk page in case you do reply. Kind regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 17:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey Wifione, please see the public log of that article. This is the previous deletion discussion. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 17:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Please see the deletion log in Navyug Sena also. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 17:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Dear Vipin Hari, I thank you for your reply. I actually still don't understand on what parameter might you be saying that the article content is similar to the previous article that got deleted? The existence of an AfD and discussions do not prove that the article that you have tagged recently is similar to the article that got deleted. This is not to say that you are definitely wrong (or right) but just to mention that I believe the tag that you have placed should/can be placed only by administrators who have access to deleted content. The only case where non-admin editors should put such a tag is when they have a userfy copy of the past deleted content. Warm regards, thanks again for your reply, and apologies in advance for the botheration. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 17:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Dear Wifione, I understand your concern. I remember this article when I tagged for deletion last time on 26 July 2010. On that day, the article was a copyvio of http://wikibin.org/articles/navyug-sena.html. NawlinWiki deleted the article with the comment A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://wikibin.org/articles/navyug-sena.html). And currently recreated article's content is also same. That's why I tagged with G4. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 17:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. That clears it. Best... ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 18:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vipinhari. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 03:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cabra Dominican College

Are you calling me a troll? I are offended!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.179.62 (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

When did I call you a troll? You've made this edit in Cabra Dominican College, which is a clear vandalism. So I've given Level 1 warning on your usertalk page. That's all I remember. Vipinhari || talk 12:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the warning. I won't make any more reverts, but I will contest the tags on the talk page.4meter4 (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

hi

how am i vandalising? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.53.25 (talk) 07:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

These edits constitute vandalism: 1, 2, 3. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 07:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Anja Kampe

Would you review Anja Kampe and the removal of its maintenance tags? We are on similar articles and I would value your opinion. ----moreno oso (talk) 06:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

User 4meter4 seems to be in edit war. Messaged him for 3RR. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 03:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out

It is very nice of you that you put comments for improving the article National Political Conference. I have fixed the statements based on the guidelines. Hope you will remove the cleansing tags -- Indiashines (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 03:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Seymour Architecture

My entry on Seymour Architecture has been deleted and your contact was left to contact about this.

This was my first entry and was planning to add some supporting entries covering the construction of europes biggest business park, cobalt. The director at Seymour Architecture was responsible for the business park and was the first entry added to wikipedia. There is also a book entitled the "Cobalt Book" which details the 10 year construction period, of which I was involved. I am in the process of making this available online.

Is this an entry that is acceptable ?

I presumed because architectural practices such as Foster and Partners can have an entry on Wikipedia, there wasn't an issue..

Thanks for the help

Kristennetsirk (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Kristennetsirk 18.08.2010

Hey Kristennetsirk, JohnCD has replied on your talk page. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 16:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Sona Nair deletion

Sir, You may delete the page as I was not able to find any reliable sources. Maybe, I can find some sources some other time. For the time being, I guess its okay to delete the page. Thanks for informing me. --Novice7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Novice7 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Novice7, let me try to find some references. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 13:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Updated Sona Nair. Please see the article. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Mate! I'm sorry I could not include any reliable information. Thanks for updating the page beautifully! Novice7 (talk) 11:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)