User talk:Violetion

Unspecified source for Image:JenniferMorrisonEmmyAwards.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JenniferMorrisonEmmyAwards.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 01:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:JenniferMorrisonEmmyAwards.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JenniferMorrisonEmmyAwards.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 01:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Tvguidecoverpx5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tvguidecoverpx5.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tvguidecoverpx5.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tvguidecoverpx5.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tvguidecoverpx5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tvguidecoverpx5.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 13:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 16:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Page Creations

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. -- JLaTondre 23:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:200 653k.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:200 653k.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 22:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jerichoflag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jerichoflag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:88697208692.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:88697208692.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Natalie Gauci has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco⁵ 01:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== Natalie Gauci ==

Hi. I made a comment on Talk:Natalie Gauci in relation to the absence of information about the popularity of Here I Am (Natalie Gauci song) and The Winner's Journey (Natalie Gauci album). I am not convinced that stating the names of which songs or albums were higher on the charts when they were released it relevant, but I think that stating that they were far less popular than any previous Australian Idol winner's debut albums or singles is very relevant. I assume that you like Natalie Gauci. I don't like Natalie Gauci at all. But perhaps there is somewhere in between where we can meet, where we can state some simple facts about how popular or unpopular she is, without it adversely affecting the article. I thought that my most recent version, referencing the previous debut singles and debut albums was a fair compromise. I do find it amusing that ARIA awarded the album platinum status when it didn't enter the top 10, in spite of other albums being in the top 10 for the entire time not being awarded platinum status - but there is a lot that is said about the accuracy of platinum status and that is an entirely different topic altogether. Nonetheless, it is relevant to list the claimed number of sales, just as it is relevant to list the proven position in the charts, and the proven comparison with other Idols. It is newsworthy, notable, provable, relevant and important. I don't see any reason not to list it.

Also you might not be aware of this, but Wikipedia is a collaboration, and it is meant to reflect a range of different perspectives, in trying to come to a neutral point of view on a topic. Somewhere in between Natalie Gauci being the best musician ever created and her being fake and only getting to win because Mark Holden had a crush on her there is some kind of a balance, something close to neutrality.

Wikipedia has a rule about ownership of articles as well, which states that you can't control an article towards your point of view. You seem to be doing this with regards to this article.

I urge you to consider adding in important and relevant information about her commercial failure. Dyinghappy (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Natalie Gauci has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Comet styles 10:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Gauci

The article is protected; I'm happy to discuss it on the talk page if you wish to suggest changes. Hopefully we can reach a consensus. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:NatMalta.PNG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:NatMalta.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Save-Me-Oprah ^(talk) 15:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cd TakeItOrLeaveIt 150.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cd TakeItOrLeaveIt 150.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:100 1959.jpg

Image:100 1959.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Natalie Gauci 2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Natalie Gauci 2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]