User talk:Violeta1290

Proposed deletion of Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law)

Hello, Violeta1290,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cryptic Canadian 03:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Cryptic Canadian 03:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Cryptic Canadian 03:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law), you may be blocked from editing. Cryptic Canadian 03:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Melissa Chase (Milo Murphy's Law) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://milomurphyslaw.fandom.com/wiki/Melissa_Chase. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meszzy² (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kisspng-melissa-chase-milo-murphy-zack-underwood-disney-ch-milo-5ac4b03d7dc942.9736731915228396135152.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kisspng-melissa-chase-milo-murphy-zack-underwood-disney-ch-milo-5ac4b03d7dc942.9736731915228396135152.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy from Wikia

Hi, I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Please don't copy articles from Wikia to Wikipedia. They're completely without sources and not suitable for inclusion on this website. That's why Wikia exists - it's a fansite, whereas Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Kisspng-melissa-chase-milo-murphy-zack-underwood-disney-ch-milo-5ac4b03d7dc942.9736731915228396135152.png

The page File:Kisspng-melissa-chase-milo-murphy-zack-underwood-disney-ch-milo-5ac4b03d7dc942.9736731915228396135152.png has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:10, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Your addition to Draft:Melissa Chase (Fictional Character) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Out of Scale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Paul Smith, James MacDonald and Nick George

Lighthouse Keeping (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Fred Jones and Harry Reeves

The New Neighbor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nick George

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lighthouse Keeping; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect at Lighthouse Keeping

I restored the redirect you removed at Lighthouse Keeping. There's just a not in apparent notability or sourcing to support an article here. It's common on Wikipedia for such stub articles to be redirected to the cartoon series, so I restored the existing consensus to redirect. If you can prove notability of this subject, please place your sources on the article talk page, so editors can review them. Thanks for your contributions, Hog Farm (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Lighthouse Keeping. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Violeta1290 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never do much edits again. I promise I'll not do more than 3 edits at a single page. Violeta1290 (talk) 05:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Edit warring is not just about three edits in a row- it is about disruption to an article by continued reversions simply to preserve your preferred version of an article. 3RR is a bright line violation- but it is possible to edit war with less than three reverts. Please describe how to handle an editing dispute should your edits be reverted. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Violeta1290 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything. I must create an article section in own words, not copying from other websites. I'm sorry to hear about that.

Decline reason:

As you claim you didn't copy anything when your article, The Trial of Donald Duck, was copied word for word from imdb, I have extended your block indefinitely. You are deliberately placing the entire project in jeopardy. Yamla (talk) 10:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chicken in the Rough (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to James MacDonald, Nick George, Bill Berg and George Rowley

Two Chips and a Miss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to James MacDonald, Nick George and Bill Berg

Donald's Dream Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roy Williams and Jack King

The Riveter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dick Lundy and Jack Campbell

Wet Paint (1946 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roy Williams and Jack King

The Lone Chipmunks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James MacDonald

Trailer Horn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roy Williams

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Your addition to Golden Eggs (film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 01:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Trial of Donald Duck

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Trial of Donald Duck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040902/plotsummary. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 16:21, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 16:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Melissa Chase (franchise)

Hello, Violeta1290. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melissa Chase".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey

Hello, Violeta1290. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Melissa Chase (Fictional Character)

Hello, Violeta1290. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melissa Chase".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Diogee

Hello, Violeta1290. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Diogee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]