User talk:Violet24

Violet24, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Violet24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mahmoud Abbas Holocaust Denial

Hello, Violet24. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mahmoud Abbas Holocaust Denial, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not propaganda but is about Mahmoud Abbas' propaganda. Most English speakers do not speak Arabic and Hebrew, that is why it is important to inform them about this. This subject has been studied extensively by Dr. Edy Cohen. If you can prove that what he wrote is not true, please do that, but until then, let's share this knowledge. --Violet24 (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mahmoud Abbas Holocaust Denial. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Nazeer (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did explain why I do not want the page to be removed. I will improve the page once I know it will not be deleted. Like I said, this page is based on University research and it is not propaganda. Mahmoud Abbas' literature, on the other hand is filled with propaganda. If you do delete the page, please give a detailed explanation. I want to be sure that the Wikipedia rules are being followed and that it is not deleted because of political objectives of certain editors.--Violet24 (talk) 20:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahmoud Abbas Holocaust Denial

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mahmoud Abbas Holocaust Denial, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I responded to your comment on the Bathsheba article, please read. As for the Mahmoud Abbas article: I admire your courage. Best to you, George 47.20.9.43 (talk) 03:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your sole warning

This edit of yours is a clear and direct violation of the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (BLP), which applies to talk pages just as it does to the article namespace. (They also violate other policies such as WP:TPG and WP:NOTFORUM).

Please carefully review the BLP policy and conform all your future edits to it. You should consider this your sole warning. Any further such edits that violate BLP will result in a revocation of editing privileges on this project. Neutrality^talk 07:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 17:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Acroterion (talk) 23:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the previous warnings were clear. As you've chosen to continue violating our policy on materials dealing with living persons, I've blocked this account. You can appeal as noted in your previous block, but there will need to be some note that you can comprehend the policies of this project and how you will apply them in the future. Kuru (talk) 22:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]