User talk:Vincenzo1492

Question

Are you also the user called Anmccaff ? Both of you posted on the same type of articles related to WWII. You edit very very little and out of blue you come from nowhere to support someone who has got exactly the same interests as you. For your record, I have improved the article, your edit summary shows bad faith. I have improved the informations I had included in the article in the legacy section. Carliertwo (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Sor

Sorry for the late reply. Your guesses are mostly wrong:

No, I’m not Anmccaff. BTW: double user accounts are generally not very welcome.

I’m on WP nearly 10 yrs and not out of the blue. But yes, I don’t have the time to edit on a daily basis.

I do NOT have the same interests as Anmccaff. EXACTLY not. My interests are feeded from a total different basis.

I generally do not support someone’s interests (i.e. an user’s interests or views). Also not my personal views. Of course it is not possible to stand back with these 100%. But I support the idea of Wikipedia. (And it irritates me pretty much that your sentence with that wrong guessing intends that we users should support the interests of other users with same interests. That not a good intention for independent and overall knowledge.)

No I am not showing bad faith, when you ignore talk pages. Yes it is ok to critize or discuss edits of other users on a factual basis. From my personal point of view it is arrogant to ignore talk pages AND instead going on with edits. Especially when you were requested NOT to ignore the talks. After this action from you (=ignoring talks) you still expect AGF and blame me for bad faith. Wow, this supports my impression of your behaviour. Or to express in an constructive manner: I would guess that you have to try to improve your exchange and co-operation with other users to achieve a result which does not satisfy you but finally the WP idea and WP community. Enjoy your day and with best wishes from VINCENZO1492 03:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)