User talk:Vincent gouta

October 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Wikipedia alternative accounts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. (many instances caught by filters). Alexf^(talk) 10:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you Alexf. - Vincent gouta (talk) 10:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent gouta, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vincent gouta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vincent gouta. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Julle (talk) 16:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This appears to be some sort of test of using block and sock templates. It is not a valid submission to Wikipedia, and sockpuppetry is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.