Jump to content

User talk:Vince Tolentino Matias15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of DYKC

[edit]

Hello Vince Tolentino Matias15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DYKC for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa Talk  02:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

2015

[edit]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Vince Tolentino Matias15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: You are blocked directly, and will need to address the reason for your block. Kuru (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock user

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vince Tolentino Matias15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry, but that blocked you gave me scared me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  13:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vince Tolentino Matias15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That block is not necessary anymore because I reviewed the lessons about how to edit Wikipedia constructively and what are the do's and don'ts.

Decline reason:

If you understand the reason why this account is blocked, then you understand why I am declining this request and telling you that you need to request your original/master account be unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 23:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain in your own words why you are blocked? -- GB fan 23:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]