User talk:VinceCustodio

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of BloombergTVPh (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Warning for Personal Attack

Please stop personal attack to be nonstanding English for Wikipedia you wish to block next time. Oripaypaykim (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And bye the way this will include to [1] has arrive but not the future and it is not only the live streaming become the home website or I will report to WP:AIV you will be stop the edit to wikipedia. Oripaypaykim (talk) 06:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Your recent editing history at Bloomberg TV Philippines shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop Edit war Oripaypaykim (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:VinceCustodio reported by User:Oripaypaykim (Result: ). Thank you. Oripaypaykim (talk) 08:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Holy Crap Stop edit war you will be block Forever. Oripaypaykim (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mkdw ^talk 08:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VinceCustodio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admins. We would like to request your kind judgement on user: Oripaypaykim. This user is recommended to be banned/blocked based on the ff. grounds: 1) This user has difficulty in understanding that the website he is including in the article is a non-functional website that has "dead links." The said user keeps on reverting the changes. 2) Also, the user has previously included additional "locally produced" programs that are non-existent and without any sources. I removed these programs and yet the said user has reinstated the "erroneous" titles again. 3) In line with this, Oripaypaykim has also "removed" several times the names of the anchors. These anchors, he was claiming are not notable. However, the names of these anchors are cited in several credible online news in the Philippines and are in fact noted on a Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2015_in_Philippine_television&oldid=697824734 4) The user seems to be having difficulty communicating / comprehension. Having said, user Oripaypaykim has lack of judgement and is not suitable to edit nor make any changes on this article as well as other articles on Wikipedia. As a conclusion, we would like to recommend that this user be "BANNED." As a responsible editor, I cannot just let this user input erroneous details on this article. Thank you! VinceCustodio (talk) 08:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests are not the place to petition for another editor to be blocked. Mkdw ^talk 08:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.