Archived! --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 08:22, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pizza delivery

I doubt this one will ever reach FA status, as I've seen some comments in the past about it being too silly a topic to even merit inclusion in the encyclopedia (when I first saw it, it had been nominated for deletion). I agree that the layout needs work - at least a fair use or public domain picture of a pizza delivery guy on the job! BD2412 T 03:39, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great if you could supply a pic. I've never been a driver, though I had a friend who was, who I rode along with once. BD2412 T 04:05, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi, I am glad to have been able to help you out. It seems to me though that the user that vandalized your userpage is rather new and doesn't really seem to understand the rules and customs of wikipedia. So I'm not really sure if it was a malicious vandal, or a confused and angry newbie. Either way I have posted some comments on their talk page and I hope they will read them this time rather than just revert them again. :) Now all we need is to make a sweet counter for userpages and have it increment everytime it gets vandalized. -- malo ^(talk)/_(contribs) 08:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, reading over his history, he's someone I warned for blanking another user's page.... looks like he was unhappy about where I posted my warning... --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*)} 08:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Black RfA

Thank you very much for your support of my RfA. Thanks, in part, to you, I am now an Administrator, and I pledge to use my newfound powers for good rather than evil. Thanks again!--Sean|Bla ck 08:11, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Brijbrij

Ahoy. Sorry for the delay in replying, I've been offline for a bit. J moss was an obvious copyvio (which someone else seems to have deleted). I tagged that and Brijbrij before gaining adminship and then promptly forgot about it. As for Brijbrij, I could not find a source, but it just screams copyvio - though closer inspection makes it seem like some students' school paper, an unencyclopedic essay with a nonsense title. The article itself is not nonsense, and it is not copyvio if the student uploaded it himself. The only safe direction is AfD, which I have initiated. Thanks for the heads-up. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IIPM

As one of the revert warriors in question, I'd like to point you here where the basic points of contention are listed by me. It should be quite clear that these have remained unanswered by the other side. There is not much doubt that IIPM is a controversial institute with some highly questionable advertising claims. Lots of Mainstream newspapers have written about the controversy that erupted recently. There is no reason to privilege the institute's claims about its infrastructure, faculty etc. over the claims of its detractors, as the supporters of IIPM have been demanding. They want to move all criticism to a separate section. ---Ravikiran 08:16, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replied [Here] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*)} 08:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for showing your support at my current RfA. I don't read cyrillic, but at least I now know what your name means, at the very least! I wanted to thank people earlier, but I wasn't sure if it was appropriate while the RfA is still running. I finally decided to do what I think is right, regardless of normal protocol, so here is a note, to show you my appreciation for your support and comments. Anything I can ever do to help you, if I can, I will. Thanks again! Hamster Sandwich 15:12, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Hi-Point Firearms, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

IIPM Reverts

Hi,

Regarding the reverts, I think you have not got the whole idea. I am just reverting pages which have been vandalized. I maintain an NPOV in this regard. The IIPM page is constantly getting vandalized by a person (or a group of them) under the name of Drnaomchomsky. They recently changed the user name to IIPMStudent9 and continues to vandalize the pages by adding things already agreed to be of POV in nature.

My queries in the user page was answered with extremely filthy language (see for yourself).I have not broke any rules or used foul language. Kunal (username:spartiate), Ravikiran (username:Ravikiranr) and I have been constantly keeping watch on the article to maintain its NPOV nature. THE ARTICLE WE THREE OF US ARE REVERTING BACK IS THE LAST AGREED NPOV EDIT.

I have tracked the IP address of the vandalizer and it originates from New Delhi, the capital of India and a place pretty close to one of the branches of IIPM. You want details, I can give it to you. But my humble request is that I am not the person to be warned in this regard. Please keep watch on the edits of the page and you will come to know. (You may not be able to pinpoint to a single person or entity because they keep changing names or some times uses the IP address edits).

I love Wikipedia and is committed to maintain it's sanctity under any circumstance. Please go through all the edits I have made so far and you will find that I have done nothing un-wiki till now. Thanks for your comments. I again request you to keep a watch on the article for a few days and reach a conclusion

PeaSea 02:06, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vilerage,
PLease see the IIPM article's talk page, where I had asked Konrad West to mediate as a neutral observer, because I was tired of the revert war played by these 3... Konrad has made observations thats are in keeping with Wiki policy, and he has found the allegations in the article biased, and based on personal blogs that cannot be cited. PeaSea, Ravikiran and Spartiate keep reverting edits, and they do not want to see any properly cited new information get added to the article. In fact, they only want to see negative info go on IIPM's Wiki.
Hope you review Konrads comment on the IIPM talk page and review the article - would appreciate you input.
Best --Iipmstudent9 11:23, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have put in a response on the IIPM talk page. Please give your comments. --Ravikiran 12:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

warning of 67.20.91.90

I noticed that you warned 67.20.91.90 (talk · contribs) for vandalism. However, after checking this user's edits, I noticed that he/she wasn't trying to vandalize. As a matter of fact, this user was trying to clean up the penis images (from the George W. Bush article) that someone else added. Hovever, this user appears to be pretty new to Wikipedia, so he/she might not have known how to revert a page properly. --Ixfd64 04:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Association of Pizza Delivery Drivers, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

supreme court revert

why the revert?

i moved the judges to a list because wikipedia isn't a list site, and the list could well be linked to elsewhere.

it also cleans up the page and shows just how much more work needs to be done on the article; i was just about to place a {{Law-stub}} tag in there... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoasif (talk • contribs)

RFA

Thanks! Tedernst | Talk 22:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vilerage are You sure about that double vote in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tedernst 2? feydey 00:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Yes, of course, accepted. Thank you! NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 07:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, Good luck ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 07:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vilerage/archive2,

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. It has done very well and is currently at 67/0/2. As such, I am posting this in advance of its closure. If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know. Thank you once again! – NSLE _(T+C+CVU) 06:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Vilerage,

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything, or if I ever do something wrong with my new powers, please contact me. Mushroom 17:09, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi негіднийлють,

(Yep, another one of these :-) Thanks for voting to support my RfA. I wasn't expecting an unopposed promotion (I thought I'd hit some die-hard edit-counters at least) and I'm touched by the trust shown in me. I'll try my best to continue to earn that trust. But first, I'll have to work on not sounding like a politician; that last sentence was awful. Oh well. Let me know when I screw something up with the shiny new buttons. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

I would like to thank you for your support of my recent successful RfA. If you have any further comments or feedback for me, my door's open - don't hesistate to drop a note on my talk page. Happy editing! Enochlau 11:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shreshth91's RfA

Hello Vilerage,

I just wanted to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. It finally closed with a tally of 22/0/0. I hope I can live up to the expectations of the entire community. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers!--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 00:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Now that my RfA is fully and officially completed, I want to thank you for your support. I appreciate your confidence that I can do the job. -- SCZenz 18:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mindmatrix scam adminship

I have recently been granted greater access to your systems, and can begin the process of salvaging the sensitive information from my politically unstable land, as I promised. Please accept this loonie as a token of faith that I will conduct myself as required to complete our transaction. Thank you for your support. Mindmatrix 20:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA for TheParanoidOne

Hello Vilerage. Thanks for the 2am Caffiene-induced vote of confidence in my RFA . I have now officially received the badge, so I shall try my best to be a good administrator. Thanks again. --TheParanoidOne 21:06, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 05:16, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime! ;] You've done it for me, afterall ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 05:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BD2412's RFA

Thank you, Vilerage, for your support in my RfA - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality of Wikipedia rise to the level of the dream. And I'll keep an eye on pizza delivery, too! bd2412 T 01:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC) ^{<--note new "admin gold" sig :-D}[reply]

Adding <noinclude> to templates

If you add <noinclude> to templates, please make shure not to insert a newline between the last char of the template code and the opening <noinclude> (they must reside on the same line). I've fixed some of your recent template edits. Thanks! – Adrian | Talk 22:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you got 'em all, learn something new every day, eh? thanks! ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 22:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Matt, thanks for your support on my RfA. The final count was 46/0/0. I hope I'll live up to your faith in me in my use of the mop and bucket. Please accept this wikithanks as a token of my gratitude ;) Hope your search for a new sig goes well! --bainer (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My failed RFA :)

Dear Vilerage,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:56, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You suck balls

Yeah, you know you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FuRiOuS1 (talk • contribs)

For those that wondered what that message is about, The user is upset that I caught, and reverted his vandalism's here and here. I think it's kinda funny, and I'm honored! Glad to be upsetting the vandals, thanks FuRiOuS1! ;] Have a good one ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 08:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Question

Is it proper to revert potential vandalism following this pattern The Potential vandal adds the up for deletation message onto a userpage.

It is clear that the user page is legit.

A link to the page in questionUser:Delirium

And a link to my talk page. please respond here as i will get a message telling me what your response is. I am off to to fighting more vandals.Eagle (talk) (desk) 20:18, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yet Another RFA Thank You Note to clutter up your talk page...

Vilerage:

Just wanted to drop you a note to say thanks for supporting me in my recent RFA. Not only was I not hanged, I managed to squeak by with a final tally of 46/13/2. The vast expanse of adminship looms before me, and I'll do my best not to screw up Wikipedia.

All the best.
→ Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 21:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvianllama's RfA

Vilerage, you are a RfA machine! Just look at all those thank-you's above!

Regarding my own potential RfA, I've made my final decision, to politely decline the nomination at this point. I am concerned that other users would make the (legitimate) complaint that I have not yet seen enough "serious" activity on the wiki, since the vast majority of my edits have been since mid-September. If you still think I merit such a gesture, I would be thrilled with the possibility of accepting another nomination in the new year. Thanks again for your support and faith - cheers. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 08:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild's successful RfA

Thanks a lot for your support on my request for adminship; it passed with 23/0/0 (plus one duplicate support and an oppose from a vandal IP). I'll do my best to make your support reason true. ;) // Pathoschild 09:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE: speedy Cat man

I know thats usually the way to do things, but 1. I made the article 2. I was its only editor 3. Its blatantly incorrect and I wish it to be gone. This particular result of my poor research shouldn't be subject to AFD. sooo yeah. I'm gonna re-add the speedy tag EDIT: Ah! never mind it is already gone.TastemyHouse Breathe, Breathe in the air 11:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

beckjord

Please note I have removed an old suggestion to trash wiki from my own forums.

Please do not keep mentioning that. It is gone.

Please do not call THIS message vandalism.

          Thanks,

beckjord205.208.227.49 23:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

THIS edit is not. I've reverted at least 3 of your edits now, to Bigfoot Erik Beckjord and Martial law if memory serves. I've mentioned that message once, by the way, wether or not you removed it, you still called for people to vandalise the wiki. I can assure you, however, that this edit is not, and will not be considered vandalism. I see you have decided to stop using User:Beckjord. If you're having trouble logging in, let me know, I might be able to help ;]. Anyhow, good luck in your future endevours ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 23:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Scientology centers

This user considers this matter to be Closed and does not wish to receive further messages regarding it. Urgent messages, and immediate problems related to this matter may be directed here. Please respect this message.

Hi Vilerage,

VfD isn't about just amassing a 50% or more votes for certain decisions, it's more of getting the community to come to a rough consensus. In this case, delete votes make up 65%, and I've seen cases where 75% are closed as 'no consensus'. I also see that a few suggesting to projectify this page, which means the page may be heading for a encyclopedic direction.

Let me know if you need any further clarifications. :)

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 05:53, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps, I'm actively working on making this much better right now - David Gerard 12:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - you said on user talk:Scott Burley, "A few of us don't think this is entirely correct, and would appreciate it if you'd take a look ;]" If there's anyone getting real pissed off at this one surviving, please do point them at the current state of the article - I really didn't have time during the AFD period, hence begging to at least projectify it. See also its talk page, where I outline how to bring it up to something of great use to an interested researcher - David Gerard 15:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes I really wish WP had a more private way of communicating with other users, in addition to the public method. Would certaintly keep people from following one around. David, because of WP:AGF I'm going to assume you had the best of intentions in replying to my message, but, in all honesty, I didn't leave it for you. And before someone mentions that there's an e-mail this user link, note that I *do* have it in my sig, and like a lot of users, the account it goes to, gets checked very very rarely due to spam. Anyhow, I'm not interested in this article anymore, it's obvious to me that nothing positive will come from persuing this, even if things went down a little shadily. I just wanna get back to vandal-whacking, and keep away from the scientology-related corners of the WP from now on (with the exception of reverting vandalism). --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 18:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was assuming we were all working on an encyclopedia ... but oh well. BTW, your map suggestion is brilliant and I'll be tracking down the Wikipedia dot-map makers for help implementing it - David Gerard 22:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked!

You have been BLOCKED for letting me block you!!! Now hopefully I can figure out how to undo it. Please don't leave nasty notes on my talk page until after the block has expired, and only then if I haven't figured out how to clean up my mess! :-D Tom e r ^talk 11:15, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SoLando's RFA

Hi Vilerage (Rage or Matt), thank you for voting in support of my RFA; the result was (28-0-0 ). I hope that I am able to fulfil the expectations of an admin. If you see me mess up anywhere, have any concerns, please don't hesitate to tell me! Take care. SoLando (Talk) 11:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Many thanks for your support during my RfA – following a 30/0/0 vote I’ve now been made an admin. Do have a Jaffa Cake! Cheers, CLW 13:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

140.247.69.195

I blocked this anon for 3 hours for his blanking evangelicalism and fundamentalist christianity. There really is no need to warn such users. The likelihood of them not continuing their vandalism is slim. freestylefrappe 21:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HI FROM BECKJORD

Please note I do not ask my forum people to trash wiki. I removed that item 8 days ago.

I am trying to work thru the system here.

Bravos for getting rid of genuine vandals.

beckjordBeckjord 08:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Hi Vilerage, Thank you for your support on my RFB. I withdrew it with a final vote of 14/5/2 and am planning on wait awhile before possibly re-applying. Thanks again for your vote. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 21:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Freestylefrappe's RFC

To tell the truth, it's the first RFC I've had any real involvement in, too, so I don't know where to add it either! My own feeling is your evidence isn't needed at this point: freestylefrappe has clearly indicated, in his discussions with SCZenz, that that was how he felt about handling things he deemed vandalism. I hope he is starting to see that the approach he has used up until now is not considered acceptable. Karmafist might feel differently regarding the diff; I'll leave it up to him. Thanks for the information! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Black List

I think that you should be informed that you are on the Black List. I wouldn't worry or anything if I were you, just conceal any personal information he doesn't have about you. No need to make things easy for banned users. Izehar (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've drafted the following email to send to the banned user in question:

Dear sir,

As one of the most prolific Wikipedia editors, I am outraged that you have neglected to include me on your "hive mind" list. Granted, I've never had anything to say about the dispute regarding which you have posted quotes, but I have added hundreds of articles and made tens of thousands of edits to this project. Frankly, my fellow editors are making fun of me for not having the badge of honor of being on your list. I am sad. Please ferret out my personal information (it should be pretty easy) and post it for the world to see.

God bless,

bd2412 T

LOL BD2412! I'm thinking of makinga special babel box for people on his 'hit list' ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 19:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's done, what do ya think?

WPW

This user is being featured at wikipedia-watch. This user must be pretty cool!.

--негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 19:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Genius! (but the link really should point to the hive mind page).bd2412 T 19:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken, I'll fix it ;] BTW, if you ever manage to get yourself listed, it's at User:Vilerage/perse. Oh, by the way, have you seen This? --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 19:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious box! I hope Brandt's blatantly hypocritical strong-arming hasn't gotten you down; I take this as some evidence that it has not. :) —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-17 08:45:42Z

Hosting for the bot

I (i keep forgetting to login, this is nick125 btw) would be willing to host the bot on my server, providing it doesnt use up too much b/w (under 10kb/s is fine). My server is running on freebsd 6.0, and is hosted on my pretty reliable DSL line. - nick125

Thank you!

Thanks for voting on my RfA! The final result was (36/1/2), so I'm now an administrator! I still think your name looks like NKOTB, by the way. :P Mo0[talk] 06:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Dear негіднийлють, thank you for supporting my RFA, which passed 64-2. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 06:28, Dec. 17, 2005

Report

I have reported you on the admin's noticeboard here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#.5B.5BUser:Vilerage.5D.5D. If you have anything to add in your defence, please do so there. I am recommending for you to be immediately stripped of your admin powers and banned from Wikipedia. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 20:20, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you would, please stop harassing me. --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 20:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

by the way, the correct link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:Vilerage . Those links can be tricky, the best way I'vee found to get 'em, is to save the link from the TOC, all the other ones rarely seem to work for some reason (at least in firefox). --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 20:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted you to know that I didn't mean to imply that actions elsewhere effect status here. I hope thats how I came across and you were just replying to the page, rather than me. --Syrthiss 23:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, no I was replying to the page ;] not you ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 07:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]