User talk:Vikrampasari

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Yogendra

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Vikrampasari, thanks for creating Yogendra!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please attend to the close paraphrasing in the "Early years" section.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a belated thanks. I'm astonished we didn't have an article on the great man; I suspect there was one, but so poorly cited that it got deleted. Well done creating one with sufficient reliable sources. I've edited your mention of The Yoga Institute's centenary to fit in with the rest of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate your efforts. I am planning to create more such articles on Yoga Gurus. --Vikrampasari (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Vikrampasari! Your additions to Draft:Bhikkhu Sanghasena have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I will ensure that I do not end up violating the copyright policies. Thank you for informing and correcting me. --Vikrampasari (talk) 13:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Remedies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Venus Remedies, does not conform to Wikipedia’s neutrality policies, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill, thank you for your message. I am not financially benefitted for writing here. I contribute on Wikipedia according to my interest. Since, the page has been moved to draft, I will make necessary changes to meet the guidelines and submit the draft under article for creation process. I firmly believe that this topic is notable as per Wikipedia notability guidelines since it is a publicly traded organization and it has sufficient independent sources to meet notability. Thank you --Vikrampasari (talk) 07:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gemini Edibles & Fats

The article Gemini Edibles & Fats has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello Vikrampasari. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vikrampasari. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vikrampasari|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae, thank you for the message and for explaining the guidelines. I am aware of the above mentioned Wikipedia's policies. I would like to inform you that I am not being compensated financially or any other medium (directly or indirectly) for contributing to Wikipedia. I do not intend to promote any subject or topic on Wikipedia. I make contribution based on my interest. Though I joined Wikipedia years back, but I am still learning and will keep improving based on the amount of time I devote to the platform. Thanks for your time and happy editing! --Vikrampasari (talk) 15:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gemini Edibles & Fats

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gemini Edibles & Fats, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venus Remedies (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are what Venus Remedies says about itself (interviews, their statements, etc.) which are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. Other sources are standard notices or other trivial coverage. Also, need to address WP:PAID/WP:COI concerns.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Venus Remedies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vikrampasari! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gemini Edibles & Fats for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gemini Edibles & Fats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemini Edibles & Fats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Driodr (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Venus Remedies

Hello, Vikrampasari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venus Remedies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paramahamsa Madhavdasji

Hello, Vikrampasari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paramahamsa Madhavdasji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Venus Remedies

Hello, Vikrampasari. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Venus Remedies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhikkhu Sanghasena

Hello, Vikrampasari. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhikkhu Sanghasena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 13:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neha Kirpal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vikrampasari. Thank you for your work on C. K. Durga. Another editor, Chocmilk03, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article! You'll see it's been tagged as relying too much on sources closely associated with the subject; if you are able to find reliable secondary sources to support points in the article, that would be helpful.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chocmilk03}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C. K. Durga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. K. Durga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. K. Durga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 08:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]