User talk:Vijay rath

October 2016

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you recently removed some content from People's Liberation Army Navy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MBlaze Lightning ^T 10:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Vijay rath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page British Indian Army has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. Your recent edit to the page 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MBlaze Lightning ^T 08:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — MBlaze Lightning ^T 15:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indian Air Force, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 15:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Russian Navy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 16:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of serving generals of the Indian Army. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ili National Army. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including at times unambiguous vandalism, a recent example being your absurd claim that the Ili National Army had two million tanks. For the present, the block is for just three days, in the hope that that will be enough to get you to start taking notice of messages expressing other editors' concerns about your editing. I will also warn you about one point which you do not seem to have been told about before, so that you may not have been aware of it. Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view, and it is not acceptable to add personal commentary or opinions into articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm John "Hannibal" Smith. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Union Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Unsourced edits. If you're referring to "at least two and a half million men served in the Union Army" that's the total number of men who served over the course of the war... not at one time, so shouldn't be assumed that equals size. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 13:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Double-stack rail transport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Surgical strike, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 04:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Indian Army during World War I. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adamgerber80 (talk) 04:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nuisance edits

Dear Vijay, I have mentioned you here Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Nuisance_edits Keith-264 (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding figures on the strength of military forces without providing a reference. I will block you if this continues, most likely for an indefinite duration given your previous blocks for similar conduct. Nick-D (talk) 08:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of serving generals of the People's Republic of China for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of serving generals of the People's Republic of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of serving generals of the People's Republic of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

pburka (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]