User talk:Vid2468

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at EgyptAir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at EgyptAir, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

8 hawkeyes

72 rafales?? i didnt edit this Are you dreaming? That is not me. 8 hawkeyes delivered needs source i agree with that but why did you delete TAI MADE F16's info also? If you do this again, I will report you this is not a propaganda institution but an encyclopedia.Cengizsogutlu (talk) 11:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Air Force

DO NOT engaged in an edit warring as done on Egyptian Air Force article. You are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users'. If they're certain changes you want to make, then do them individually, as opposed to reverting the entire article. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FOX 52 (talk) 04:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Damocles (targeting pod). And please also do not revert without explanation--that is also uncollegial. Drmies (talk) 16:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned again and again and you persist in acting as if a picture from some Twitter feed is somehow an acceptable secondary source, when links to our policies are literally all over this page. Drmies (talk) 14:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]