User talk:Victory's Spear

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Victory's Spear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Capetian House of Anjou. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Dynaflow babble 07:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Philip of Bourbon-Two Sicilies

Hello Spear!

Prince Philip's only son Prince Gaetano's marriage was considered morganatic marriage at its time and so his children were not allowed the titles of Prince of Bourbon-Two Sicilies or Princess of Bourbon-Two Sicilies. Therefore, they are excluded from the current line of succession to the defunct throne of the Two Sicilies. Now, morganatic marriages are accepted by the disputed leaders of the House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies so perhaps one of these days they will grant Gaetano's descendants with the titles of Prince and Princess. --Caponer (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and also, Prince Pedro, Duke of Noto did not seek his father Infante Carlos, Duke of Calabria's permission before his marriage and so his children are not titled Prince or Princess of Bourbon-Two Sicilies. --Caponer (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commune

All Italian articles have "Comune di" in the infobox for the official name. Ciao and good work. --Attilios (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Naples is the second most populated metropolitan area in italy!!! second, after Milan!!! there are many references: only world gazeetter says that Rome is the second most populated area, but very references (ONU, SVIMEZ, EUROSTAT, ISTAT, ETC...) say that naples is the second most populated metropolitan aerea in italy!!! io say to put how references, the second!!! becasuse very references say tha Naples the second, Rome only world gazzetter!! please!!--Denver85 (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my english :)--Denver85 (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sic Bar

No probs. Giano (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modernism

The jpg is appropriate in its context, and bears a caption that identifies it as a Romantic work painted in 1830. A reader, noting the contrast between Delacroix's painting and the Hofmann painting that stands at the top of the article, is unlikely to confuse the two; the reader who makes it to the sixth paragraph of "Beginnings" will begin to understand that Modernism has something to do with the difference they see. In my opinion this enhances the article. Please discuss your ideas for rewriting on the article's talk page. If your goal is greater cohesion, can you explain why you prefer that a paragraph describing the origins of Modernism in the 1840s-1870s be placed under the heading "Beginning, 1890-1910", rather than in a section that covers the first 80 years or so of the 19th century? You also deleted a citation and a reference, for no apparent reason. Ewulp (talk) 08:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

(edit conflict with preceding post)

Please don't make accusations of vandalism,[1] unless there is evidence that the user's intent is to deliberately sabotage the project. See WP:VANDAL. User:Freshacconci has an outstanding record of contributions, and I can only see at worst a misunderstanding in this instance. Ty 01:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NB: Vandalism is a serious charge. It should not be used to describe an editorial disagreement. Disagreements should be worked out by discussion on the talk pages, and questioning the good faith of other editors only makes it more difficult to resolve problems. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 13:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vicotry's Spear

Regarding your recent move of Occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem by Jordan to Control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem by Jordan, I don't know if you looked, but the naming of this and similar articles has been discussed many times at great length on the respective talk pages and the consensus was to call "it" an occupation.

This is an important issue since it influences how occupations/controls/rules of other territories (e.g. the current status of the West Bank and Gaza Strip) are labeled.

Could you re-consider your move?

Cheers and thanks, pedrito - talk - 05.11.2008 12:54

Thank you

For your vote at Roman Catholic Church. I am sorry to inform you that we failed FAC but will again be at peer review in a few weeks to sort things out. Hopefully we will make it through next time. We will be contacting all supporters and opposers of the article when we open the next peer review to hopefully get all issues addressed and hashed out before the next FAC try. Thanks again for your time and attention to this important article. NancyHeise ^talk 01:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very Wrong

Hello, this is Galati and I was the one who was asking regarding the relatedness of the Romanian people. According to this new genetic map conducted by the University of Amsterdam, the Romanians are close to other Balkan peoples (Bulgarians and Greeks) but also the Italians as well. And contrary to what you may think of about speakers of Latin languages being related. The Italians, Spanish, Portuguese and the French all show similarities with the Italian population genetically: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/science/13visual.html

Orphaned non-free image File:European National Front.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:European National Front.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Thatcher I Cabinet

Template:Thatcher I Cabinet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Nevé –selbert 15:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swiss Peoples Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swiss Peoples Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 23:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]