User talk:Victorianbe2

Welcome!

Hi Victorianbe2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Thedefender35 19:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thank you so much! Victorianbe2 (talk) 19:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

have fun using wikipedia

	wikipedia star of hello
	hello and enjoy your stay at wikipedia Thedefender35 19:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mass media in the United Kingdom into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. eviolite (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Lam312321321 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lam312321321. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 03:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Victorianbe2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I woke up this morning after making two edits yesterday to find my account banned and being accused of being a stockpuppet. I was banned by TheresNoTime when I have no form of connection to the said stockpuppet. I have been editing for a long while and I am have no form of connection with Lam312321321. This ban is really unfair because I am innocent & not a stockpuppet. Victorianbe2 (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've reviewed the SPI and find it convincing. If you aren't a sockpuppet you are a meatpuppet. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.