User talk:VictorO
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 16:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Your contributions will be more useful if you join the discussions on the talk page. Adding an edit summary also helps. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @
"Careless edit"
[edit]Obviously you have not actually been looking at the edits you make, otherwise you would not have been repeatedly reinserting a typo. Please do not edit if your only intention is to push your own POV. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you really want to keep vandalizing the Prem Rawat article?
[edit]It will likely end in a ban (and an investigation of whom you are a sockpuppet of), so kindly stop. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mael-Num (talk • contribs) 21:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC).
Very well.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Prem Rawat, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Sandstein 22:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)