User talk:Victim of Coho
January 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page TheGreatHatsby has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jwesley78 04:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on TheGreatHatsby. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Baseball1015 (talk) 07:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Probably useful info
[edit]User:Zvn has not messaged you regarding edit warring. Tiderolls 08:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to TheGreatHatsby. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Baseball1015 (talk) 08:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, Baseball1015 is the one who messaged me about this. All I'm trying to do here is to inform people about this ridiculous AIM spam going on. I really, really don't want to be banned for that. Thanks, Victim of Coho (talk) 08:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Your request
[edit]I've replied to your message at Talk:TheGreatHatsby. Regards Tiderolls 08:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to TheGreatHatsby. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Baseball1015 (talk) 08:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Re:
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I've replied further. Tiderolls 08:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
TheGreatHatsby
[edit]Where are you getting all this information about ProjectU bots? --Secundus Zephyrus (talk) 21:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
They've been IMing me nonstop for the past week. It's all first-hand experience. Victim of Coho (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not supposed to be based on first-hand experience. (See Wikipedia:No original research) --Secundus Zephyrus (talk) 20:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- I realize that, but where else is this information going to be hosted? People have a right to know what's going on, and any other place this could be hosted is too obscure and no one would be able to find it. Victim of Coho (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree. I have found many many places with info. The Live Journal community is one. And if you search any of the old bot names on Google, you find dozens of other people listing them all on their blogs. Only the new ones don't turn up anything, but what you're doing isn't helping. Google any of the new bot names, and Google finds nothing. Not even the wiki page. --Secundus Zephyrus (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- What do you think I should do then? Victim of Coho (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I don't think you need to do anything. I was smart enough to figure it you, you were smart enough to figure it out. I'm sure anyone else who really wants to know can figure it out, too. :) --Secundus Zephyrus (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- What do you think I should do then? Victim of Coho (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree. I have found many many places with info. The Live Journal community is one. And if you search any of the old bot names on Google, you find dozens of other people listing them all on their blogs. Only the new ones don't turn up anything, but what you're doing isn't helping. Google any of the new bot names, and Google finds nothing. Not even the wiki page. --Secundus Zephyrus (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- I realize that, but where else is this information going to be hosted? People have a right to know what's going on, and any other place this could be hosted is too obscure and no one would be able to find it. Victim of Coho (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of TheGreatHatsby
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, TheGreatHatsby, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheGreatHatsby (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Baseball1015 (talk) 00:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)