User talk:Vicoturmeric
July 2018
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Abecedare (talk) 06:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC) |
Vicoturmeric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
kindly unblock I am not sock Vicoturmeric (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sockpuppetry is confirmed via technical evidence and you have provided no reason to believe it is wrong. Yamla (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vicoturmeric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here what other reason I can give which I don't have, I don't understand why was I blocked without prior notice all of a sudden, Wikipedia an open source and anyone has the right to edit, if you block me then how can I edit? Vicoturmeric (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 15:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It is not the case that you have the right to edit Wikipedia. This shows a profound misunderstanding. --Yamla (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Vicoturmeric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, I haven't caused any damage or disruption to Wikipedia, allegations levied are false,I hardly made any edits, so kindly unblock me Vicoturmeric (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your ability to make further on-wiki appeals has been withdrawn due to your repeated refusal/inability to address the reason for the block. MER-C 16:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.