Jump to content

User talk:Vicoturmeric

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2018

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vicoturmeric (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

kindly unblock I am not sock Vicoturmeric (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is confirmed via technical evidence and you have provided no reason to believe it is wrong. Yamla (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vicoturmeric (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here what other reason I can give which I don't have, I don't understand why was I blocked without prior notice all of a sudden, Wikipedia an open source and anyone has the right to edit, if you block me then how can I edit? Vicoturmeric (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  15:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is not the case that you have the right to edit Wikipedia. This shows a profound misunderstanding. --Yamla (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vicoturmeric (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, I haven't caused any damage or disruption to Wikipedia, allegations levied are false,I hardly made any edits, so kindly unblock me Vicoturmeric (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your ability to make further on-wiki appeals has been withdrawn due to your repeated refusal/inability to address the reason for the block. MER-C 16:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.