User talk:Vickypedian

Welcome

Hello, Vickypedian, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheRedPenOfDoom,

" One can correct someone who is wrong. But one cannot correct someone who does not want to be right."

First of all, Thanks for your Support. But i find this really demotivating. I am never a regular contributor. I just saw something valid was missing in the page and thought to add it. But with no reason it was deleted. I am not sure if i will ever spent my valuable time for stupid things like this anymore.

There was already a Wiki page ( A hyperlink for the film title which is approved by someone like you) for the film i mentioned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_%28film%29

In that case adding another so called "reliable source citation" of an external website seems to be little stupid for me. That indicates that wikipedia does not trust itself.

And of-course you made a mistake about the the information i posted. Because the film about which i mentioned released today. Anyway i am not going to do anything more on it. Let some other smart guy do it who can make it more believable to you.

Its so sad to see that Wiki lives in Past and future tense but cant see the present tense :) (at-least in this case) That page was missing the movie which released today but has his other forthcoming movie details.

No hard feeling on you. I know that you did it with good intentions. I am just giving a personal feedback of my experience as a contribute to Wiki. The act really demotivated me in "TRUSTING" Wikipedia and "HELPING" Wikipedia. May be you should have searched for it and confirmed with me. Anyways all the best for your future "DELETIONS" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.3.168.191 (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

not trusting what you may see on Wikipedia is a good idea. Thats why we require reliable sources to be cited so that the reader can verify content for themselves. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, then how can a reader like me verify all the 15 films mentioned in his filmography with no Citations at all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nivin_Pauly Whats make this film so un-trusty which is released today. In that case i would request you to delete the below hyperlink. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_%28film%29 Or shall i do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.3.168.191 (talk) 05:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sverker Johansson

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Sverker Johansson, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/technology/60167034/How-one-man-wrote-8-5-of-Wikipedia.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lsj?uselang=no is his user page on svwiki and in my opinion doesn't count as another wikipedia page. By all means create a page here if you think he is notable, which I'm not sure of. Sjö (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's also sv:Sverker Johansson, but it's about a different person. Sjö (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And now there's sv:Sverker Johansson (fysiker) which you can link to if you create an article here. Sjö (talk) 08:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sverker Johansson (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Mdann52talk to me! 16:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vickypedian, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Mdann52talk to me! 16:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]