User talk:Vickydvignesh

Welcome!

Hello, Vickydvignesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Vijay 2017.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Majora (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vijay 2017.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vijay 2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vickydvignesh. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vickydvignesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Vickydvignesh (talk) 18:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So these "many guests" of yours have all created accounts whose names resemble yours and have edited exactly the same articles you edit, in exactly the same way? Sorry, I don't believe that. Huon (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i was the only user of this pc/server but
this Computer in recent weeks was used by many of my guest , i think they have misused it .

But Now i am aware of the guidelines please unblock the IP Block Bbb23 (talk) , since some of my brothers also use the same server . this won't happen , am sure of it. Vickydvignesh (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vickydvignesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Vickydvignesh (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your claim, below, is not plausible. Yamla (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

there were many guests and one of them used one pc and thats my pc , which had multiple logins (password saved) which was misused. the IP level block is affecting other users also , i am sure this won't occur again please unblock !! Vickydvignesh (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vickydvignesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Vickydvignesh (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I do not believe your explanation. But at best, if we are to believe you, then your account is compromised, and cannot therefore be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:11, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have been using Wikipedia for many years, i really assure this won't happen again this whole thing was a big mistake Can you please the unblock the IP level BLOCK and i have read the Guidelines it says we should not repeatedly ask for unblock requests so please guys consider this one time unblock me.

Notwithstanding your comment above, you have made from this account a total of only twenty-two edits, and only since 2013, of which four were deleted. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yeah but the block affects by IP level which also affects the other users like my brother who also edits, but those Abusive Edits were done by other cousins who just came for holidays they are not here anymore & they used my only computer and which had multiple accounts and saved passwords, they were messing with whole editing things. I am back in Full Control , I do edit stuff but not often and not abuse . Vickydvignesh (talk) 16:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will note that you were using multiple accounts to push the same series of edits that violated WP:SYNTH and directly contradicted a statement from a reliable source on worldwide sales. All four accounts are at least a couple of month old. (Amvicky created 24 October 2014; Vickyluffy created 22 August 2016; Jallikattuman created 16 January 2017) So if it really is the fault of your "cousins", its rather convenient that they all had similarly named accounts and using the exact same language in the edit summaries. —Farix (t | c) 17:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]