User talk:Vice regent/Archives/2017/June
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vice regent. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You've got mail!
Message added 15:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Tyler Durden (talk) 15:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikihounding
You need to stop WP:WIKIHOUNDING like you did just recently[1], article was rather a bit extended opinion piece by an IP on April, and for writing 2 or 3 sentences we really don't need an article, but it can be written on the main article itself. Use WP:COMMONSENSE. Capitals00 (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Moral police is the article you maybe looking for. Capitals00 (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- I only reverted after discussing on the article's talk page. Yet you reverted without making any attempts to discuss on the article talk page. Please participate in the discussion. Thanks, VR talk 01:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Cow-based lynching
You moved the actual page without a consensus[2]. Please, tell the reason here. Jionakeli (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
Your recent editing history at Cattle protection-related violence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Warning: No harassment in wikipedia
Please do not cast aspersions against me or other wikipedia editors without edit diffs as you did here in these remarks. Please stop harassing me (see this, for more). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)