User talk:Vic01toire

April 2024

Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Besins Healthcare without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have not explained why you have completely removed the controversy section of the article. Cahk (talk) 07:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Besins Healthcare, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Once again - You have yet to explain why the controversy section is removed. Certainly article is to be updated as time evolves, but specifically targeting one section and removing it altogether is, at best, questionable. Cahk (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vic01toire. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vic01toire. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vic01toire|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. HansVonStuttgart (talk) 08:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your helpful feedback. As you recommended I mentionned the fact that i'm an employee of Besins Healthcare in my user page.

i also left all the existing content on the page and just add more, looks like it still an issue, what could I do to prevent that?

Thank you Vic01toire (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. VViking_TalkEdits 13:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Besins Healthcare) for adding promotional text to the encyclopaedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]