User talk:Vexuris6

Welcome!

Hello, Vexuris6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Emma Frain, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sparthorse (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emma Frain

The article Emma Frain has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sparthorse (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wilfred Hitler

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wilfred Hitler, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sparthorse (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Noel's Christmas Presents, you may be blocked from editing. Sparthorse (talk) 11:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wilfred Hitler. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 11:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Noel's Christmas Presents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sparthorse (talk) 11:56, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stuart Elmore

The article Stuart Elmore has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sparthorse (talk) 11:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noel's Christmas Presents

Including nonsense like "The show is rare in that it has never used pixellation to obscure people's faces, or that of businesses, unlike on TV shows such as Rogue Traders or Tonight with Trevor MacDonald, yet it has a legal responsibility to do so." makes it clear that your only purpose is vandalism. The obviously hoax articles show this as well. I strongly suggest you stop now. Sparthorse (talk) 12:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vexuris6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, so I made a few mistakes but I've been silly. I did try and edit helpfully.

Decline reason:

See WP:EBUR (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.