Jump to content

User talk:VexVector

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi VexVector! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 04:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Boom Boom Pow, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you for pointing out that electro is also uncited :). ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 10:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Labour saving devices

[edit]

Ref your edit to Dagger (mark), I guess you didn't know that you can just write [[crossguard]]s and "the system" sorts it out (like this: crossguards). Same trick works for longer appendages, like [[duel]]ling. No harm if you prefer to do it the long way. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful information.
VexVector (talk) 00:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to New World Depression, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About Ltbdl 

[edit]

Ltbdl is vandalizing 15 page and trying to get it removed. Please report them. RocketKnightX (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s going to be resolved in the talk-page. Vex-Vectoꝛ 12:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic 15.ai.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

ltbdl☃ (talk) 15:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Since nobody notified you during the editing of 15.ai that infoboxes are considered contentious topics. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 09:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]