User talk:Verwarming

Welcome!

Hello, Verwarming, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ecotechnics?

Hi Verwarming.

I see you have some interest in Ecotechnics? I don't think this is a topic for its own article. As best I can tell, it is a WP:Neologism by Derrida. Has anyone else, after Derrida, talked about the same concept of ecotechnics? If not, it is only worth a mention on a Derrida page. I also note there is no wikt:ecotechnics entry. That would have to come first, but again, I think it fails as a neologism. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SmokeyJoe.

I did some edits and found more sources. Do you think it is ok now? Could you give me some feedback? -- Verwarming 08:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

That’s good. It’s still weak. It now includes some definition, and a few people who have used the term. Has anyone commented on the term? Or commented on someone else’s use of the term? You might like to additionally complete the dictionary entry at wikt:ecotechnics. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]