User talk:Kaswa

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Kaswa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Pumeleon^T 00:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Verve Communications. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Pumeleon^T 00:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lorraine Langham to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pumeleon^T 00:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Verve Communications. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Pumeleon^T 00:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please read WP:BIO and WP:ORG for notability guidelines on biographies and organizations, respectively. Pumeleon^T 00:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pumeleon - thanks for your advice. Can I ask, though, why I wouldn't be able to add a page about Lorraine Langham, though? I'm not sure I understand why it would be inappropriate to add information about a person, with their permission, who is an individual with a public profile. Does it need a rewrite? If so, let me know, and I certainly shall. Thanks in advance for your help.

Regardless of actual notability, and article must state somehow that a subject is notable. Notability is usually established by a "secondary source;" which is to say, something about the subject that was written independently of the subject itself. If you can find two or more articles, books, or anything biographical on the subject in which the subject is featured, and not just mentioned in passing, then it will be considered notable. If you have any more questions, please ask me on my talk page. Pumeleon^T 00:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick talk tutorial

Thanks for coming to my page. It tells me whne I have a new message.

Anyway, a few points to remember in the future:

when asking a new question, or starting a new topic, always use the + next to "edit this page." Then, type the subject in the subject/headline box.
At the end of your posts on talk pages, always sign your name with four tildes. ~~~~ just like that. It will come up similar to the end of my post.

And welcome to wikipedia, your official welcome message will be coming soon. :3 Pumeleon^T 00:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username

You should change your username at Wikipedia:Changing username. Usernames that promote a company are not allowed as usernames and eventually the account will be disabled. see Inappropriate usernames.--Hu12 08:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rockpools

Rockpools is related to Verve Communications and the other articles (see above) created (Kaswa) under your previous name User_talk:VerveKS. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the articles created by you do not comply with the guidelines of WP:COI. Wikipedia is not a vehicle to be used for advertising or promotion. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.--Hu12 20:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. But that doesn't mean I'm not constructively contributing to the encyclopedia - as I'm just adding information about subjects I know about using verifiable facts. How will I contribute anything if I don't already know something of the subject? Everything I wrote about is factual and is about notable organisations, and if the articles don't fit into the guidelines - you believe it to be promotion or advertising - then shouldn't you or another contributor edit the articles so that they do fit into the guidelines, rather than deleting it? --Kaswa 20:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", but if you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with--Hu12 21:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Private Eye story true?

Hi Kaswa. Is the Private Eye story true? if not, I deeply apologise, but if so then I think these articles will have to go. NBeale 12:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just undeleted the rest of this talk page -- NBeale, have you just bought this week's Private Eye as well? Dave-ros 12:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It might be helpful to explain that the following story appeared in the British satirical magazine Private Eye of 13 April 2007:

"WIKI WITCH

"Not content with putting her distinctive slant on local government media releases, the slippery tentacles of PR guru Lorraine Langham have now been exposed trying to manipulate Wikipedia.

"Her Verve Communications consultancy outfit which, er, masterminds publicity for Tower Hamlets council (Eyes passim), has received a slap on the wrist for trying to turn the online encyclopaedia into a corporate advertising billboard. Wikipedia administrators spotted the ruse last month when a user called “VerveKS” posted an entry for “Lorraine Langham” and linked it to Verve’s own website. Unaware of Langham’s notoriety as the handsomely paid head of “strategic communications” at Tower Hamlets, Wikipedia editors rather sweetly asked “who the heck is she?” and then read VerveKS the riot act. “Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion,” they explained. The username would have to change and “inappropriate links” to Verve’s website were banned. They also demanded proof that Langham passed the site’s “notability” test and asked for at least two “independent” articles about her. At that point VerveKS changed her username to “Kaswa” ... [Kaswa] has been “bigging up” other Verve clients on Wikipedia, including Hamish Davidson, boss of an obscure headhunting firm called Rockpools. Kaswa promised to add links to Langham’s own articles “which will hopefully highlight her notability”, So far, the material has not arrived, but if Wikipedia does relent, there’ll be no shortage of people queuing to make online edits. Such as about how she banned journalists from last year’s Tower Hamlets election count for “health and safety reasons”; how she got rid of popular town hall press officer Eileen Short (sister of MP Clare) for spending her spare time campaigning against council home sell-offs (Eye 1146); and how she managed to persuade her friends in charge of Tower Hamlets — Britain’s second most-deprived borough — to pay her company £1m of public money last year when she originally quoted £250,000 for the work (Eye 1177). Happy surfing!" Don't-stop-the-music 14:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hamish Davidson

An editor has nominated Hamish Davidson, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamish Davidson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]