User talk:Vertiwiki

Stade de France

Some sources can be bad sources... A lot of newspapers consider that every show at the Stade de France gathers 80.000 people. But it can be less (Rolling Stones: 62.000) or more (U2: 96.000) despite estimations from TV and press.

Only exact attendance figures can be posted here. These official figures come from Billboard and Pollstar, which publish them every year...

For Mylène Farmer DVD, the information can be published on the page, no problem, but why is it the first information on the page? This type of information is anaecdotic.

I will provide the sources. (you can refer to the french page dedicated to this stadium ...)

Stade de France

Vertiwiki, you're right. Thks for giving us sources for several attendance scores.

You contribute to the quality of Wikipedia, despite the rigidity of one or two fans of an artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophie2011 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stade de France, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stade de France. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 09:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stade de France. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Ute in DC (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vertiwiki for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. —Ute in DC (talk) 10:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 14:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]