User talk:Veritas Ohio
August 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Danny Bubp, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 03:21, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Uecker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 03:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Veritas Ohio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't have mutilple accounts -- what other account do I allegedly have?
Decline reason:
Please have only one unblock request open at a time. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
:Block message is "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OSUHEY" Ronhjones (Talk) 00:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Veritas Ohio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As noted above, I don't have multiple accounts. I looked at the investigation page and, as best I can tell, I got "thrown in" "just in case it's a good sock, bad sock case" -- whatever a good sock, bad sock is. As was stated in the debate of whether to block me, one reviewer didn't "see that you've provided any evidence that these users are related, certainly not for Veritas." Amen. Then it is decided because "we've blocked a number of 69.223.32.* IPs before", I guess mine gets blocked, even though that's not my IP. It appears one is guilty until innocent. Or apparently, the decision to block was not because of multiple accounts but because of "behavior" for camping out -- nothing's been untruthful in inaccurate, the only thing most recently removed was because of a lack of reference which I can easily provide, but can't. Bottom line -- where's the proof of multiple accounts -- I don't "see that you've provided any evidence that these users are related, certainly not for Veritas."
Decline reason:
And if that was where the conversation actually ended, you would have a point. A combination of WP:CHECKUSER and behavioral evidence was user in making the determination that you are a sock account. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)