User talk:Venu62/Archive8

Tamil in FAR

Tamil language is in featured article review.--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parthi, Tamil language is in FARC. If we don't act together to fix perceived problems, it will lose the FA status. Please take a look. It appears it is just copyedit. Your help would be much appreciated. I've left messages in Sundar and Arvind's pages, but not sure whether they are around. I believe you can help. Please take a look.--Aadal 13:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo is coming to Sydney

Sorry to spam you if you aren't interested. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney#April 25th for more info if you are interested. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Happy New Year Parthi! Please take a look at the Tamil language FARC. We're not still there. We want to keep our FA in the new year! Tony has suggested that I try and book Sundar and Arvind and you for a few hours. I'll seek extra time. I tried to solicit help from the league of copyeditors as well. There are only a few tags and I believe I can fix them. Sorry to bother you when you're on vacation!--Aadal 19:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for ur contributions for Khandoba

Dear Venu I appreciate ur interest in the Khandoba article. But can i plz know the reason y u r deleting the info at Khandoba article. i agree that info needs to put in proper paras and in more formal tone, but that does not mean u delete it. Plz reply.--Redtigerxyz 14:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I confess that the info added by Vishal was in utter dismay. would it be fine if the info from the Malhari Mahatmya is shortened and put in back? --Redtigerxyz 12:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited Khandoba article summarising the story keeping the Wikipedia standards in consideration. Please take a look.--Redtigerxyz 14:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this:WP:ANI#Request_block_on_IP_121.247.253.70. In case you have anything to add? --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 07:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Date of the Tolkappiyam, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sarvagnya 22:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a retaliatory warning messge showing stress and angst of a frustrated user. I take no heed of it. Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 22:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The warning was in retaliation to your vandalism here. Its shameful that you now choose to hide it by choosing to personally attack me. Sarvagnya 23:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content edits and [1] are not vandalism. Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 23:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

With regards to your comments on [[:User_talk:Venu62]]: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sarvagnya 23:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hold your horses. Will you?

Hold your horses till you get a reply. People are not sitting here at your beck and call. Its hardly been few mins since you posted it on that talk page. First you launch a coordinated major rewrite of the article, then you vandalise another article(while another is busy on yet another), then you resort to personal attacks and now you throw your pompous self on my talk page. I posted concerns about suspected copyvio yesterday and I am still waiting to see a reply and yet I havent gone ahead and removed it(those pics) mainly in deference to Arvind who uploaded them. Try addressing those issues while you hold your horses on things that you are ignorant about. I can only deal with one article at a time. If you have questions about an article, take it to the talk page first. What a pity that I have to be dealing with you people instead of Arvind. Sarvagnya 23:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning templates

Venu62, Please check these messages. I request both of you to discuss rather than use warning templates. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 03:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]