User talk:Ventu.pimp
Welcome!
Hello, Ventu.pimp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Spellcast (talk) 06:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit]
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to 50 Cent discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Spellcast (talk) 06:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
August 2008.
[edit]Not all reviews use stars, and 10 reviews is enough per Wikipedia guidelines. --HELLØ ŦHERE 10:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
[edit]Please read this: Template:Infobox Album#Professional reviews. If you continue changing non-starred ratings to stars and otherwise violating Wikipedia:Manual of Style, you will be receiving "stop vandalism" templates. Thanks! Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 12:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
United World Chart
[edit]Please do not add the United World Chart, or any other chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 22:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit] Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to T.I. discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DiverseMentality 17:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
April 2009
[edit] Your recent edit to the page T.I. discography appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. — Σxplicit 22:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Bad charts
[edit]Please compare the charts you want to add to articles to WP:BADCHARTS before proceeding. This is the second message on your talk page about adding charts that violate WP:BADCHARTS. The Bulgarian singles chart is listed there, as is the Italian chart on acharts.us. Additionally, the unsourced chart position you added for the Spanish charts on Right Round did not verify at the official site. Since Right Round never made the official Italian charts, I couldn't correct that position. Accordingly, I've reverted your edit.—Kww(talk) 12:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- I found a source for the Spanish position, so I added it back in.—Kww(talk) 13:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Italiancharts.com has the official FIMI charts. If you have any sourcing that shows that the chart on acharts.us is a good archive of the M&D chart, please bring it up at WT:Record charts. We've tried to validate it before, but have been unable to. M&D only publishes the top 5 on the web, and only has one week available, so no one has been able to crosscheck the archive at acharts.us against it. It would be much easier for everyone if we could prove that the acharts archive is good, so don't feel like people are going to fight for the sake of fighting ... we just need something we can validate.—Kww(talk) 13:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's a different issue. I agree that the M&D chart is a good one, and would have no problem including it. What we need is some evidence that the chart on acharts.us is the M&D chart. The FIMI chart is, as you say, a digital-only chart, but at least it's an official, sourced, and reliable digital-only chart.—Kww(talk) 14:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- We've been through this discussion before at WT:Record charts, and the decision was to exclude it, because it couldn't be validated. All I can ask of you is to use the FIMI chart as long as the acharts.us chart is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Like I said, it would make everyone happier if there was a way to validate the acharts.us archive, so if you ever find anything, bring it up there. If you just want to try again to convince people that matching the top 5 is enough evidence, you can try that, too. Personally, I think the acharts chart probably is the M&D chart: we've had a couple of Italian editors say so, and the guy that runs acharts has said so in an e-mail. Me thinking so personally isn't enough, though. Evidence is what we need.—Kww(talk) 14:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- You can give it a try at WT:Record charts. I don't do this based on personal opinions of whether a chart should or should not be on WP:BADCHARTS, I just follow it. If you want it to change, bring it up there.—Kww(talk) 15:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- We've been through this discussion before at WT:Record charts, and the decision was to exclude it, because it couldn't be validated. All I can ask of you is to use the FIMI chart as long as the acharts.us chart is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Like I said, it would make everyone happier if there was a way to validate the acharts.us archive, so if you ever find anything, bring it up there. If you just want to try again to convince people that matching the top 5 is enough evidence, you can try that, too. Personally, I think the acharts chart probably is the M&D chart: we've had a couple of Italian editors say so, and the guy that runs acharts has said so in an e-mail. Me thinking so personally isn't enough, though. Evidence is what we need.—Kww(talk) 14:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's a different issue. I agree that the M&D chart is a good one, and would have no problem including it. What we need is some evidence that the chart on acharts.us is the M&D chart. The FIMI chart is, as you say, a digital-only chart, but at least it's an official, sourced, and reliable digital-only chart.—Kww(talk) 14:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Italiancharts.com has the official FIMI charts. If you have any sourcing that shows that the chart on acharts.us is a good archive of the M&D chart, please bring it up at WT:Record charts. We've tried to validate it before, but have been unable to. M&D only publishes the top 5 on the web, and only has one week available, so no one has been able to crosscheck the archive at acharts.us against it. It would be much easier for everyone if we could prove that the acharts archive is good, so don't feel like people are going to fight for the sake of fighting ... we just need something we can validate.—Kww(talk) 13:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Polish Singles Chart
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dead and Gone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not add the Polish Singles Chart, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. — Σxplicit 22:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi
RIAA awards are total, not cumulative. For example, if the RIAA's highest award for Flo Rida is "2x Gold", this means the highest award is "2x Gold" - not "2x Gold + anything awarded previously".
Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 14:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you're unhappy with using the RIAA website to verify RIAA certifications, you could checkout Billboard: their list has "Right Round" at Gold, Platinum, Multi-platinum (i.e. highest so far is "2x Platinum") and no listing for "Sugar" - which exactly tallies with the RIAA site.
- Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 14:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Bad charts, once again
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to R.O.O.T.S.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You must stop adding charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS, such as the Brazil Hot 100, to Wikipedia articles. You have been warned multiple times, and it must stop.—Kww(talk) 02:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]
Your recent edit to the page Nicki Minaj appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Yves (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
FL Thanks
[edit]On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that has contributed to the recent WP:FL promotion of Kanye West discography
 | This user helped promote Kanye West discography to featured list status. |
--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)