User talk:Venterius

AfD nomination of Robert E. Dunn

I have nominated Robert E. Dunn, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert E. Dunn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Roleplayer (talk) 01:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Robert E. Dunn. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert E. Dunn. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 02:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re deletion nomination of Robert E. Dunn

To answer your query, a lawyer or attorney has to be notable in more than just one county of the United States in order to warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I am not the only editor to have trouble finding verifiable references about this guy. You need to provide evidence of how someone is notable, that meets the verifiability guidelines. -- Roleplayer (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Polcari

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Michael Polcari, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sematech.org/includes/bios/polcari.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sunflowers

Your sexual obsession with soil is unnatual, unhealthy, and sinful. Please refrain from following through with your impulses or I will be forced to commit you.Thriley (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter Minestrini

The article Walter Minestrini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]