User talk:Venezolano2014

Derwick Associates

Please stop making unsourced edits to the Derwick Associates article. Please use the talk page to determine what should or should not be included. Or else your edits will be reverted. Thanks 27.122.12.69 (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derwick Associates reversions

Please stop edit-warring. You cannot cut and paste corporate information from a company and post it to Wikipedia without it being an RS. Further, you've been asked to go to the talk page and make edits after a civil discussion. I request that you please stop this. It is not constructive and it is actually making (who I suspect are) your bosses look very bad and heavy-handed. The backlash will be worse. This should be a NPOV, sourced, balanced article. Nothing on it, at present, is not backed by an RS. Can we please discuss on the talk page? 27.122.12.69 (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I responded to you on my talk page: The company website is not a valid source for wikipedia. Please read WP:RS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.122.12.69 (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.122.12.69 (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, Venezolano2014. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Derwick Associates, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Venezolano2014, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Venezolano2014! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]