User talk:Vekrull

Thank you very much for your input. It is quite helpful. This is a school project, and it is due tonight; so, we have to wait until then to edit it. However thank you again for the comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vekrull (talk • contribs) 15:17, March 23, 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Vekrull, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Geniac (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chrysomya megacephala, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chrysomya megacephala was changed by Vekrull (u) (t) deleting 9918 characters on 2009-03-30T06:05:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Chrysomya megacephala. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vekrull didn't remove the content, just simply moved it to a different spot on the page. Also, he did this per my suggestion on the C. megacephala talk page, because I do not feel that the two sentences on Mitochondrial DNA are substantial enough to have an entire heading on their own. I agreed with his edit, as he did not remove the content but moved it to a better location on the page. Dachshundcrazy (talk) 07:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chrysomya megacephala

Hi Vekrull, you added the following to the Chrysomya megacephala article on 16th April: "The parents are there the entire for rearing of the offspring, ensuring survival." The citation following does not seem to support the statement and attentive parenting does not fit my idea of flies, but I suspect you know a great deal more about the subject. Is this correct or have I misunderstood the statement. IanOfNorwich (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]