User talk:Vein eater

ReaSoft Converter

A tag has been placed on ReaSoft Converter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of ReaSoft Converter and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 21:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PDF Printer ReaSoft

A tag has been placed on PDF Printer ReaSoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of PDF Printer ReaSoft and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 21:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ReaSoftPDFprinterLogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:ReaSoftPDFprinterLogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Reasoft

You might want to have a discussion with Finngall, who tagged your article for speedy deletion. One tip on getting articles kept in general - find and include in the article reliable secondary sources that assert the verifiability and notability of the subjects in question. Good luck! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 09:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your deleted articles

I've looked at the deleted versions of "ReaSoft Converter" and "PDF Printer ReaSoft". Here are some of my findings:

First and foremost, avoid "advertisement language". For example, this paragraph is a particularly incriminating example: "Founded in 1999, ReaSoft Development is a IT company specializing in producing efficient, well-made and user-friendly software to meet the needs of both business professionals and amateur home users. At the same time, our products have found a home with thousands of novice digital photographers and webmasters." Wikipedia strives for neutrality. Consider it this way: We're not in business of selling things. We're not in business of promoting a business. We're not obligated in telling how the company in question views themselves, according to their marketers. And above all, we should avoid buzzword-laden stuff that is completely devoid of content: "...specializing in producing efficient, well-made and user-friendly software to meet the needs of both business professionals and amateur home users..." Yeah, just like just about every software company on the planet! Not remarkable at all! <sarcasm>If they'd be deliberately producing slow, bug-ridden and difficult-to-use software for very marginal userbase, that would be something worth mentioning!</sarcasm> =)
Avoid "our great bottle-grown article" syndrome. "Regardless of what applications are being used to create the original documents, ReaSoft PDF Printer can convert them to PDF format." <sarcasm>No, really? It really works just like Distiller? I would have never guessed.</sarcasm> In short, the articles should integrate to other Wikipedia articles; instead of listing your features like they'd be latest and greatest proprietary inventions, they should only cover what's completely unique to them - everything else can be covered briefly. For example, the fact that virtual printers can be used for PDF generation is already covered in virtual printer article; instead of explaining how virtual printers work in ReaSoft PDF Printer, you probably could improve the virtual printer article and tell how virtual printers can produce PDFs.
Outside sources are important. The FinePrint article you mentioned might not be the best example of this, but if you have sources that explain why this product is so famous and worthy of note, that'd be good. See notability, verifiability and reliable sources.

The articles had some details on what the products are and what they do, but they could have used a certain amount of explaining on why the products are so important. For example, FinePrint might not, in current incarnation, need that much explaining right now; it's an established product, almost everyone in graphics industry has at least heard about it in passing, just searching for "FinePrint" nets 6 million Google hits, so it's not unreasonable to assume that it would get expanded with details. An article about a less known product might not be so fortunate; you probably need some more initial footwork to convince everyone that this in fact is a famous product.

As a general tip, I'd say that it'd probably be more fruitful to build an article on the company itself, including information about the products, then create redirects from product pages to the company article. A notability of a company and all of its products is usually easier to demonstrate than notability of individual products.

Hope this helps, and happy editing! --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have little if anything to add to what Wwwwolf has said, and whole-heartedly endorse his advice. --Finngall ^talk 15:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://.reasoft.com

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 12:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ReaSoft Image Converter

A tag has been placed on ReaSoft Image Converter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ju66l3r (talk) 06:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image conversion

A tag has been placed on Image conversion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ju66l3r (talk) 06:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Reasoft pdf printer

A tag has been placed on Reasoft pdf printer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ju66l3r (talk) 06:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Image conversion

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Image conversion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ju66l3r (talk) 07:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ReaSoft Image Converter

I have nominated ReaSoft Image Converter, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReaSoft Image Converter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ju66l3r (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Reasoft pdf printer

I have nominated Reasoft pdf printer, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasoft pdf printer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ju66l3r (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ReaSoft Image Converter

A tag has been placed on ReaSoft Image Converter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 20:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]