User talk:VegetativePup

Welcome!

Hello, VegetativePup! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Closedmouth (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Men's Daily News

I think I'm definitely reading WP:WEB more broadly than you are, but I think MND meets those criteria.

"The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations" First of all, I found a wealth of trivial mentions of MND (far too many to list), indicating that it's a well-established, fairly prominent website. That said, WP:WEB suggests that websites should be the subject of multiple, independent, non-trivial published works. Upon closer examination, many of the sources I located with Google only mentioned MND tangentially, although it's worth noting that they treated it as a fairly prominent site. Here are some sources that are independent of the subject that count as significant coverage:

[1] is an article about MND that appeared in several major newspapers.
[2] is a magazine article about MND.
[3] is a published online work about MND.
[4] describes MND as a "credible, daily news, commentary, sex roles, satire, irreverence, metropolitan trends," although I'm not sure if that counts as a reliable source.

"The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization" N/A

"The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster" Not sure if this applies. For what it's worth, I was able to find articles from MND on other sites, although I'm not sure if any one of those qualifies under this criterion.

It's definitely a borderline case. I'll post this to the AfD as well, and we'll see how it plays out. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you remove the Volleyball section on the David Starr Jordan HS (Long Beach) page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdsids85 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]