User talk:Vega61

RETIRED

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi I have only one account here, it's on my computer. I don't any other accounts, It appears that I have been linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yattum}. I have no connection to anyone or person, mention in that investigation. Through cross reference I have got one drawing, of many which I have converted to SVG, belonging to ANigg, If thats a crime doing work on another troubled account, than I'm sorry. I have spent countless hours on several articles, I think my contribution record should speak for itself. I have followed the wiki laws to the letter, fixed any copyright inaccuracies, and have work through any problems with all editors. I hope that this unfortunate error, can be fixed As soon as possible. Vega61 (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The CheckUser result was a clear 'confirmed', not 'possible', 'likely', 'probable'. As such the evidence would appear to show that you have used multiple accounts - and as Magog the Ogre points out, your editing style is similar. As such, I feel that the block was correctly applied to this account and so I am declining this unblock request -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How do you explain the positive checkuser result, which indicates that you are editing from the same IP address as the Yattum as well as the same IP address to a very similarly named account? --Jayron32 06:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's more, your writing style is similar, and this coincidentally came just an hour or so after the decline on User talk:Viper 265. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not as computer savvy as you guys, but I can't see how it's possible to for someone else to use my IP address, unless it was hacked, & I don't even know if that possible. Again If someone can show me, where I've committed, some major violations, other than alleged sock puppets, then I would agree. This is unfortunate snice I have in good faith contributed to Wikipedia, spent many hours uploading good lic "my own work" images. When I say my own work it means I spent hours working these articles. Does someone with bad intentions, do that? Finally if my user name is considered corrupt due to my IP Address, can I create a new user account, cause Vega61 is blocked, or is that considered being a sockpuppet? How can I get back to editing, if possible? Thank You Vega61 (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I would so like to help you here, and I will offer some suggestions, but your obstinacy makes it impossible for me to unblock now. "I can't see how it's possible to for someone else to use my IP address, unless it was hacked" ... right, that's what we're saying is that you used and abused the other accounts. "Does someone with bad intentions, do that?" Yes; the banned users list includes many once-productive editors. "How can I get back to editing, if possible?" State which account you will use and use only in the future, consent to the other ones being blocked permanently, and disclose any other alternative accounts of which we were not aware. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok well thank you for you help talk, I guess I should be banned then. It would have been nice to continue editing and, now I must pay for my actions. If anyone out there has any suggestions to get me back, would appreciate it deepy Vega61 (talk) 15:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, I guess we're all in agreement, then. Smashville^talk 15:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So how do I get back to editing? can I create another, User name, without breaking the sock puppet rule? If my suppose it accounts have been blocked then I wouldn't have multiply accounts? right? Vega61 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Absolutely understood, I would never want to do anything, to be disruptive, but only good faith edits. If someone looks at my contributions , you'll see as Vega61 I at no time did engaged in any misuse of my account. No swaying of votes, or try to persuade another editor for an article consensus. All my work has been to contribute in good faith. If unblocked I Guarantee you won't hear a peep out of me, except good edits. Now come someone, lift the iron drape off me. Vega61 (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, you seem confused. Your usernames were not blocked -- you, the human being who used the account User:Yattum, are banned from Wikipedia, and you are not welcome under any username. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not him the human or user name, I would love to have someone show me my IP address under User:Yattum, there's no way, checkuser log is wrong! Vega61 (talk) 21:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, we don't do that; for perfectly understandable reasons. You've got this big "Retired" hed now; I think that means you'll be OK with me revoking your access to this talk page in addition to declining this as you just don't seem to get this. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:400px-Roundel of the Lebanese Air Force svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:400px-Roundel of the Lebanese Air Force svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dem, Congolese Air Force Roundel.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dem, Congolese Air Force Roundel.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-Afghan Army Rpoundel.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-Afghan Army Rpoundel.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 11:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haiti Roundel.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haiti Roundel.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haiti Roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haiti Roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FAH Roundel AF.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FAH Roundel AF.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FAH Roundel AF.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FAH Roundel AF.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FAH Roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FAH Roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAAF Low viz Roundel.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RAAF Low viz Roundel.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAAF Low Roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RAAF Low Roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAAF Low Roundel 2.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RAAF Low Roundel 2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oman Roundel(2).png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oman Roundel(2).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Oman Roundel(2).svg

A tag has been placed on File:Oman Roundel(2).svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-Netherlands roundel svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-Netherlands roundel svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-Swedish Air Force Roundel Low Viz svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-Swedish Air Force Roundel Low Viz svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-SAAF low Viz Rndel svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-SAAF low Viz Rndel svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:519px-Nepal Air Force Roundel 282 29SVG svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:519px-Nepal Air Force Roundel 282 29SVG svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:310px-Singapor Air force Roundellow Viz svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:310px-Singapor Air force Roundellow Viz svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singapor Air force Roundellow Viz.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Singapor Air force Roundellow Viz.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malawi Air Army Roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Malawi Air Army Roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-BahamasRoundel svg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-BahamasRoundel svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-Roundel Equatorial Guinea svg.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-Roundel Equatorial Guinea svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-Roundel of the Croatian Air Force 28low vis 29.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-Roundel of the Croatian Air Force 28low vis 29.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NATO OTAN Roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NATO OTAN Roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:430px-Czech roundel artsvg.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:430px-Czech roundel artsvg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air Force Roundel Burund.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Air Force Roundel Burund.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HONG KONG Roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HONG KONG Roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honk kong roundel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Honk kong roundel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MV-22 3 point drawing.png

The file File:MV-22 3 point drawing.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]