User talk:VeerlokWarriors

VeerlokWarriors, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi VeerlokWarriors! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Baal Veer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 03:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Baal Veer. Sea Cow (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my mistake but I just wanted to rectify the false information. If you watch Baalveer, then you might know that Baal Pari is his adoptive mother, but an editor Queen Fairy is changing the plot as her likes. I didn't know how to revert edits. So, I had to erase and paste the previous revision. Please, inform 'Queen Fairy' editor regarding this. VeerlokWarriors (talk) 03:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that should be taken up on the talk page for the article, not through edit warring. jp×g 20:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jayani joshi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jayani joshi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeerlokWarriors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is not a sockpuppet of any account. I hold only a single account independent of any other user or account.

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address the concerns and findings raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jayani joshi/Archive. Yamla (talk) 16:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeerlokWarriors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not involved in any sockpuppeting. I don't know how to provide evidence for this. I request the administrators to look into this and please solve this issue.

Decline reason:

You've been told what you need to do by Yamla above. Please speak to the specific concerns raised. Note that even if you operate a single account, it could still be meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeerlokWarriors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of Bansari Patel12 as accused. I completely understand that some confusion may have led the admins to block me. But I request the admins to look into this. They may check https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bansari_Patel12 for the user contributions of the account , I am accused of being a sockpuppet of which. The contributions are completely different from mine and include merely a single page. I sincerely ensure that if I am unblocked, there would be no issue arising from my account. Kindly, solve this.

Decline reason:

This is not a credible rebuttal of the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jayani joshi. Further poor unblock requests may lead to a removal of talk page access. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeerlokWarriors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please reply to the apeal made by me above. I ensure that I will abide by the rules and norms.🙏🏼

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.